Teams

Meier-Jimenez/Rogers/SVCC

2025 Adult 40 & Over Spring League 2.5-4.0 · 2.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.70 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-13vs Wallace/BV/KTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesJulie Smith / Denise Contreras vs Tara Fleming / Audra Peterson1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesLaura McDougall vs Dawn Adams4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKirsten Meier / Heidi Behnke vs Jamie Perez / Kristen Walnofer7-5, 6-0
2025-04-14vs Douglas/Springdale/SRCWon 21
W#1 DoublesJulie Smith / Alida Fitzpatrick vs Charity Williams / Sheila Logan4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKelley Herr vs Elizabeth Dizney6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKirsten Meier / Heidi Behnke vs Caren Lyne / Susan McCarthy1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-04-08vs Wallace/BV/KTCSplit 11
W#1 SinglesAlida Fitzpatrick vs Kristen Walnofer6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesErin Hulliberger / Laura McDougall vs Audra Peterson / Dawn Adams2-6, 3-6
2025-04-06vs Douglas/Springdale/SRCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesChristy Williams / Kirsten Meier vs Elizabeth Dizney / Kelsey Lewis6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesLaura McDougall vs Charity Williams0-6, 2-6
2025-04-02vs Wallace/BV/KTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesKirsten Meier / Julie Smith vs Audra Peterson / Dawn Adams3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesErin Hulliberger vs Elizabeth Wallace0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLaura McDougall / Kelley Herr vs Tina Shideler / Barbara Taylor5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2025-03-15vs Douglas/Springdale/SRCLost 02
L#1 SinglesKelley Herr vs Elizabeth Dizney3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLaura McDougall / Heather Johnson vs Karen Nelson / Linda Berry2-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.30 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.61
Alida Fitzpatrick
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.49
Erin Hulliberger
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.27
Heidi Behnke
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.25
Kelley Herr
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Heather Johnson
published 2.5
2.23
Laura McDougall
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
1.96
Denise Contreras
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Kirsten Meier
usually #4 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura McDougall + Kelley Herr314 matchesnot enough data
Kirsten Meier + Heather Johnson123 matchesnot enough data
Kirsten Meier + Heidi Behnke303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Alida Fitzpatrick
14W–19L career · 5 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
2.61
2.5
Erin Hulliberger
13W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%54%46%
2.49
3
Heidi Behnke
8W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
96%4%<1%
2.27
Kelley Herr
13W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.25
2.5
Heather Johnson
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Laura McDougall
10W–16L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.23
2.5
Denise Contreras
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.96
Kirsten Meier
8W–24L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.