Teams

Cereo

2021 Tri Level Women · 4.0,3.5,3.0

14 players · average NTRP / WESTERN REGION

View scouting list →
Schedule13 played
2021-01-03vs Syr: Dickson/GoldbergLost 01
L#1 DoublesKelly Falconer / Bee Tolman vs Brianna Laureti / Mary Kaye1-6, 3-6
2020-12-20vs MannixLost 03
L#1 DoublesBee Tolman / Heather Marrin vs Katelyn Nguyen / Anne Brandt1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Greetham / Mindy Turner vs Barbara Crane / Jana Kasik3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRenee de Nevers / Ashley Hayes vs Kim Waale / Nicole Christina7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2020-12-13vs RadoffSplit 11
W#2 DoublesSusan Greetham / Heather Marrin vs Betty Szatkowski / Lynda Otis4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesShelley Smith / Renee de Nevers vs Juliet Concilla / Elisabeth Moughty2-6, 0-6
2020-12-06vs Syr: Dickson/GoldbergLost 02
L#2 DoublesMary-Ellen Cereo / Susan Greetham vs MARY CURRELL / Jacki Goldberg1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesClaire Reichl / Shelley Smith vs Francie Smith / Emily Vacher1-6, 1-6
2020-11-22vs MannixWon 10
W#2 DoublesMindy Turner / Fran Ferguson vs Deborah Cavanagh / Barbara Crane6-4, 6-4
2020-11-15vs RadoffLost 02
L#1 DoublesFran Ferguson / Susan Greetham vs Ainslie Ellis / Tracy Bates2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMary Lovely / Renee de Nevers vs Juliet Concilla / Susan Berger4-6, 3-6
2020-11-08vs Syr: Dickson/GoldbergLost 03
L#1 DoublesKelly Falconer / Fran Ferguson vs Kristen Boyd / Nikhila Krishnan1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMindy Turner / Heather Marrin vs MARY CURRELL / Sarah Elliott1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesShelley Smith / Ashley Hayes vs Eunhee Park / Doreen Kingsley1-6, 2-6
2020-11-01vs MannixLost 02
L#1 DoublesGillian King / Bee Tolman vs Elizabeth Milliken / Kris Chan0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesClaire Reichl / Renee de Nevers vs Sandy Sulik / Kim Waale1-6, 4-6
2020-10-25vs Bates/NardellaSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKelly Falconer / Ping Zhang vs Carri Moore / Karen Nardella6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesFran Ferguson / Susan Greetham vs Lori Kunz / Nancy Radoff6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2019-12-29vs RadoffLost 02
L#2 DoublesMary-Ellen Cereo / Mindy Turner vs Marla Share / Anocha Walsh0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesRobyn Connor / Shelley Smith vs Lisa Campagna / Roberta Mangano1-6, 1-6
2019-12-15vs ZhangSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRenee Joseph / Bee Tolman vs Anne Brandt / Elizabeth Milliken2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesShelley Smith / Margaret Webster vs Christine Scollay / Elaine Quintana2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2019-11-24vs WilcoxLost 01
L#1 DoublesGillian King / Bee Tolman vs Julie Grossman / Karen Nardella1-6, 1-6
2019-11-10vs MannixLost 12
L#1 DoublesPing Zhang / Gillian King vs Kris Chan / Elizabeth Milliken2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesGwenn Judge / Mindy Turner vs Barbara Crane / Deborah Cavanagh6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesRenee de Nevers / Shelley Smith vs Christine Scollay / Allison Delaney4-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0,3.5,3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Kara Krueger
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.19
Mindy Turner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.60
Renee de Nevers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.59
Shelley Smith
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Bee Tolman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Bodhi Borer
usually #3 Doubles 89%, also #2 Doubles 11% · published
Elaine Quintana
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Fran Ferguson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Gillian King
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Heather Marrin
published
Kelly Falconer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Mary-Ellen Cereo
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Ping Zhang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Greetham
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mindy Turner + Susan Greetham2551% games+2.5% vs expected
Shelley Smith + Renee de Nevers0531% gamesnot enough data
Mary-Ellen Cereo + Susan Greetham123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kara Krueger
60W–99L career · 6 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.30
Mindy Turner
43W–66L career · 5 lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.19
Renee de Nevers
43W–61L career · 5 lines in 2021
22%78%<1%
2.60
Shelley Smith
25W–89L career · 6 lines in 2021
25%75%<1%
2.59
Bee Tolman
10W–26L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Bodhi Borer
19W–9L career · 9 lines in 2021
not enough data
Elaine Quintana
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Fran Ferguson
2W–5L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Gillian King
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Heather Marrin
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Kelly Falconer
3W–20L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Mary-Ellen Cereo
28W–39L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
Ping Zhang
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Susan Greetham
27W–54L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.