Teams

Culver/LF

2024 TUL ADULT 65 & Over League · 6.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / OKLAHOMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-19vs Burch/LF 65&overWon 30
W#1 DoublesVivienne Culver / Rita Skaistis vs Barbara Evans / Kitty Morel6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesClare Ashby Carpenter / Sandra Surwilo vs Teruko Blackburn / Trenna Strauss6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMonica Fincher / Michele Smith vs Cindy Vick / Judy Turner6-1
2024-05-08vs Park 65/ISWon 21
L#1 DoublesBonnie Bell / Bonnie Canfield vs Kema Hicks / Carla Kimbrough3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesClare Ashby Carpenter / Jo Ann Bodenstab vs Gwen Walls / Phillis Woods2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMonica Fincher / Michele Smith vs Tammy Mattox / Terri Leader3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-04-21vs Love/TTC 65 & overLost 03
L#1 DoublesBonnie Canfield / Deborah Lee vs Martha Endsley / Crystal Stovall4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesVivienne Culver / Sandra Surwilo vs Liliana Crossley / Laurie Swarer3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesBonnie Bell / Rita Skaistis vs Deidra Kirtley / Janis Taylor6-7, 3-6
2024-04-07vs OK/Sacra/65&over6.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesVivienne Culver / Clare Ashby Carpenter vs Donna Hazle / Janet Rader6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDeborah Lee / Rita Skaistis vs Kimberly KnifeChief / Julia Meier5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBonnie Canfield / Bonnie Bell vs Gayle Johnson / Vicki Smith6-7, 2-6
2024-03-17vs Donnelly/LFLost 12
W#1 DoublesVivienne Culver / Clare Ashby Carpenter vs Blanca Falcon / Debbie Lienhart6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJo Ann Bodenstab / Michele Smith vs Janice Green / Debbie Smith2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesBonnie Bell / Bonnie Canfield vs Nancy Cooper / Virginia Porto6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2024-03-10vs Love/TTC 65 & overLost 03
L#1 DoublesClare Ashby Carpenter / Vivienne Culver vs Liliana Crossley / Martha Endsley2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBonnie Bell / Bonnie Canfield vs Gayle Roberts-Pisklo / Laurie Swarer7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJo Ann Bodenstab / Deborah Lee vs Ann Smith / Sue Zeng1-6, 2-6
2024-03-03vs Burch/LF 65&overWon 30
W#1 DoublesVivienne Culver / Rita Skaistis vs Jo Ann Dean / Leslie Naughton6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJo Ann Bodenstab / Michele Smith vs Kitty Morel / Jeanette Griffith6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesMonica Fincher / Deborah Lee vs Trenna Strauss / Donna Weatherl6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 6.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OK/Sacra/65&over6.0W702016119
2Love/TTC 65 & over5215615170
3Culver/LF3491226187
4Donnelly/LF3471430207
5Park 65/IS2581326192
6Burch/LF 65&over1641735242

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.60 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.86
Clare Ashby Carpenter
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
Deborah Lee
published 3
2.55
Bonnie Canfield
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.52
Vivienne Culver
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
2.48
Bonnie Bell
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
Georgia Burd
published
Jo Ann Bodenstab
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Monica Fincher
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Rita Skaistis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Sandra Surwilo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bonnie Canfield + Deborah Lee6161% games+13.8% vs expected
Clare Ashby Carpenter + Vivienne Culver9752% games−0.8% vs expected
Bonnie Canfield + Bonnie Bell111449% games−10.1% vs expected
Monica Fincher + Deborah Lee3251% gamesnot enough data
Clare Ashby Carpenter + Deborah Lee314 matchesnot enough data
Bonnie Bell + Deborah Lee224 matchesnot enough data
Georgia Burd + Vivienne Culver213 matchesnot enough data
Vivienne Culver + Sandra Surwilo123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Clare Ashby Carpenter
34W–29L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%84%15%
2.86
3
Deborah Lee
21W–28L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Bonnie Canfield
29W–23L career · 5 lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
2.55
Vivienne Culver
70W–58L career · 6 lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
2.52
3
Bonnie Bell
25W–26L career · 5 lines in 2024
56%44%<1%
2.48
Georgia Burd
25W–46L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jo Ann Bodenstab
24W–19L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Monica Fincher
38W–37L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Rita Skaistis
6W–4L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Sandra Surwilo
5W–3L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.