Teams

MPaul-ENO

2024 Eno River Combo 18 & Over · 18 & Over Combo 8.5 Women Weekend

14 players · average NTRP 3.89 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-10-05vs JRoss-ENOLost 01
L#2 DoublesSpenser Radtke / Hillary Mulder vs Valerie Acre / Amanda Linke2-6, 4-6
2024-09-28Won 10
W#3 DoublesHannah White / Hillary Mulder vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-09-21vs SBurkert-HVCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesTanya Sirivolu / Nhon Nicole Cobb vs Laura Virkler / Mollie Williams7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAnita Yang / Sindhu Shivaji vs Amanda Lacoff / Virginia Dirschl4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesSpenser Radtke / Hillary Mulder vs Paulina Salerno / Emily Howell7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2024-09-14vs ATomkins-ENOWon 10
W#1 DoublesSindhu Shivaji / Tanya Sirivolu vs Bren Woods / Elizabeth Heald3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-08-31vs JRoss-ENOLost 02
L#1 DoublesAllyson Hays / Aly Miller vs Leah Weinberger / Emily Johnson4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSpenser Radtke / Hannah White vs Betsy Shane / Hannah Silverstein4-6, 3-6
2024-08-24vs ELinnander-SVCLost 02
L#2 DoublesAnita Yang / Hannah White vs Eve Hammett / Tiffany Langino4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAly Miller / Katie Evans vs Meghan Rider / Suyeon Kim3-6, 2-6
2024-08-17vs SBurkert-HVCCLost 02
L#1 DoublesKatie Evans / Tanya Sirivolu vs Paulina Salerno / Ashley Freedman1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesHannah White / Aly Miller vs Emily Howell / Amanda Lacoff3-6, 2-6
2024-08-10vs ATomkins-ENOSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTanya Sirivolu / Elizabeth Harvie vs Leslie Boesch / Nancy Pack6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAbby Olmsted / Aly Miller vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Combo 8.5 Women Weekend have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.55
Winnie Louh
published
4.21
Tanya Sirivolu
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.97
Caroline Yu
published 4
3.90
Sindhu Shivaji
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.86
Spenser Radtke
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.70
Aly Miller
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.66
Hillary Mulder
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.64
Elizabeth Harvie
published
3.62
Nhon Nicole Cobb
published
3.62
Abby Olmsted
published 3.5
3.55
Madison Paul
published
3.53
Katie Evans
published
3.30
Hannah White
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.16
Anita Yang
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hillary Mulder + Spenser Radtke111648% games+0.1% vs expected
Aly Miller + Hannah White2445% gamesnot enough data
Hillary Mulder + Katie Evans044 matchesnot enough data
Hillary Mulder + Elizabeth Harvie224 matchesnot enough data
Katie Evans + Elizabeth Harvie314 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Harvie + Aly Miller314 matchesnot enough data
Hillary Mulder + Hannah White123 matchesnot enough data
Katie Evans + Hannah White033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Winnie Louh
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.55
4.5
Tanya Sirivolu
93W–41L career · 4 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
4.21
4
Caroline Yu
17W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
3.97
4
Sindhu Shivaji
73W–32L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.90
4
Spenser Radtke
105W–79L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%84%16%
3.86
4
Aly Miller
19W–33L career · 6 lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.70
4
Hillary Mulder
46W–63L career · 4 lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.66
Elizabeth Harvie
21W–11L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%1%
3.64
Nhon Nicole Cobb
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.62
3.5
Abby Olmsted
4W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%21%79%
3.62
Madison Paul
6W–16L career · no lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
3.55
Katie Evans
20W–18L career · no lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
3.53
3.5
Hannah White
87W–144L career · 8 lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Anita Yang
0W–5L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%1%
3.16

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.