Teams

Will Play for Chardonnay 18+

2022 Howard Columbia Adult 18 & Over · Howard Columbia Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.38 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule13 played
2022-06-15vs Sets in the City 18+Lost 02
L#1 DoublesGerrie Bost / Ilene Fishkind vs Nicole Brizan / Sorina Eftim3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 SinglesEbla Aliibrahim vs Eboni Lance4-6, 3-6
2022-06-11vs Sparks 18+Lost 01
L#3 DoublesIlene Fishkind / Susan Flaherty vs Lisa Paulman / Anne Swartz4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-06-01vs Smashed 18+Won 20
W#2 SinglesEbla Aliibrahim vs Roslyn Waddy6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Hatton / Megan Kessler vs Terri Curran / Shannon Shapiro6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2022-05-26vs Ladies of the Net 18+ 3.5Split 11
W#1 DoublesCorlyn Krinsky / Sanghee Lee vs Rachael Evans / Kimberly Sbarra6-0, 3-3
L#1 SinglesEbla Aliibrahim vs Michelle Limeres2-6, 4-6
2022-05-21vs E-I-E-I-O 18+Lost 02
L#1 DoublesSanghee Lee / Megan Kessler vs Julie Swartz / Laura Haney6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Hatton / Toni Vanderputten vs EnPing Wang / Debra MacDonald4-6, 2-6
2022-05-17vs Segrist 18+Lost 03
L#1 DoublesCorlyn Krinsky / Debbie Tow vs Kimberly Stepherson / Kelly Garofalo7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesIlene Fishkind / Amy Lamont vs Adrienne Borkowski / Holly Kohr4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesChristine Dotson / Ebla Aliibrahim vs Valerie Hicks / Lauren Antlitz6-7, 2-6
2022-05-12vs Courts In Session 18+Won 21
W#1 DoublesCorlyn Krinsky / Ebla Aliibrahim vs Valerie Pierce / Cynthia Rapp6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesToni Vanderputten vs Karlene Brathwaite2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesGerrie Bost / Ilene Fishkind vs Suzanne McHugh / Alecia Brinkley6-1, 6-3
2022-05-07vs Net Assets 18+Won 30
W#1 DoublesMegan Kessler / Sanghee Lee vs Esther Wang / Patricia Demme6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesEbla Aliibrahim vs Susan Reichard7-6, 6-4
W#2 SinglesGail Poole-Vaughn vs Anne Talvacchio6-2, 6-4
2022-04-27vs Oaksmith 3.5 18+Won 21
L#1 DoublesMegan Kessler / Debbie Tow vs Brenda Crowe / Rochelle Porter5-7, 2-6
W#1 SinglesGail Poole-Vaughn vs Margaret Asher6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesThu Pham / Ebla Aliibrahim vs Elisa Oaksmith / Stacey Lyons7-6, 6-2
2022-04-23vs Ladies Who Love 18+Split 11
L#1 DoublesGail Poole-Vaughn / Debbie Tow vs Kathy Greene / Jennie Kim2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesToni Vanderputten / Samantha Norris vs Karin Johansen / Maryanne Gruys6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2022-04-21vs Spin-derellas 18+Won 20
W#2 DoublesIlene Fishkind / Debbie Tow vs Na Yi / Christine Lee6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesGail Poole-Vaughn / Corlyn Krinsky vs Chanpen Teeranon / Patcharavalai Lawhcharoen6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2022-04-20vs Casual Sets 18+Split 11
L#2 DoublesIlene Fishkind / Christine Dotson vs Ann Hagen / Linda Morris2-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesToni Vanderputten vs Elizabeth McLeod6-7, 6-0, 1-0
2022-04-11vs Players Are Ready 18+Lost 01
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Hatton / Toni Vanderputten vs Kara Jones / Kim Meissner3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Columbia Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Megan Kessler
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.49
Sanghee Lee
published
3.40
Gerrie Bost
published 3.5
3.34
Corlyn Krinsky
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.25
3.18
Ebla Aliibrahim
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.12
Ilene Fishkind
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
2.94
Susan Flaherty
published
2.87
Gail Poole-Vaughn
usually #3 Doubles 25%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Amy Lamont
published 3
2.72
Toni Vanderputten
usually #2 Singles 30%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 3
Thu Pham
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Corlyn Krinsky + Gail Poole-Vaughn15756% games−8.0% vs expected
Ilene Fishkind + Gail Poole-Vaughn2444% gamesnot enough data
Toni Vanderputten + Gail Poole-Vaughn123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Megan Kessler
76W–38L career · 4 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
Sanghee Lee
38W–21L career · no lines in 2022
<1%52%48%
3.49
3.5
Gerrie Bost
5W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Corlyn Krinsky
79W–44L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.34
Victoria VanderPutten
10W–12L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Ebla Aliibrahim
60W–136L career · 6 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Ilene Fishkind
169W–160L career · 6 lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.12
Susan Flaherty
2W–11L career · no lines in 2022
67%33%<1%
2.94
3
Gail Poole-Vaughn
91W–113L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
Amy Lamont
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Toni Vanderputten
97W–155L career · 10 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
2.72
Thu Pham
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.