Teams

STC-Ritze

2022 OH OV WINTER 40&O Mixed · Winter 40&O 8.0MXD

16 players · average NTRP 4.14 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-04-30vs QRRC -JohannesSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMike Ritze / Melonie Johnson vs Sonja Johannes / Ryan Maurer6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBrian Thomeczek / AYESHA CURE vs Patricia Gilmore / Robert Huston6-2, 6-1
2022-04-02vs SRTC-SmithLost 01
L#3 DoublesTodd Haines / Patricia Robinson vs Christy Smith / David Ehlers0-6, 2-6
2022-03-26Lost 01
L#2 DoublesBrian Thomeczek / AYESHA CURE vs Aaron Wolters / Patricia Gilmore2-6, 4-6
2022-01-30Lost 01
L#1 DoublesEd Pearson / Melonie Johnson vs Aaron Wolters / Patricia Gilmore4-6, 5-7
2022-01-16Lost 01
L#2 DoublesChris Compton / Lori West vs Rick Quigley / Raya Tabrah6-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Winter 40&O 8.0MXD
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1QRRC -Johannes4213514162
2SRTC-Smith3310820179
3STC-Ritze2441429194

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.10
Enrico Ferri
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.09
Renuka Dewan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.01
Christine Burkle
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.85
Ed Pearson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.83
Chris Compton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.81
Lori West
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.80
Melonie Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.74
AYESHA CURE
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4.5
3.68
Tanya Rhodes
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.67
Audrey Vanhoose
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.58
Therese McNea-Wiley
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.57
Brian Thomeczek
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.46
Todd Haines
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.35
Mike Ritze
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published
2.99
Kim LaPole
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.69
Patricia Robinson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Renuka Dewan + Mike Ritze3258% games+3.9% vs expected
Christine Burkle + Enrico Ferri8755% games+0.7% vs expected
Ed Pearson + Therese McNea-Wiley5251% games−0.3% vs expected
Mike Ritze + Audrey Vanhoose5354% games−0.9% vs expected
Kim LaPole + Mike Ritze3639% games−4.3% vs expected
Mike Ritze + AYESHA CURE3255% gamesnot enough data
Brian Thomeczek + Christine Burkle314 matchesnot enough data
Todd Haines + AYESHA CURE123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Enrico Ferri
143W–91L career · 6 lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
4.10
Renuka Dewan
98W–94L career · 2 lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
4.09
4
Christine Burkle
237W–119L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%46%54%
4.01
4
Ed Pearson
38W–43L career · type S · 1 line in 2022
<1%87%12%
3.85
4
Chris Compton
100W–59L career · 1 line in 2022
1%90%10%
3.83
Lori West
183W–83L career · 1 line in 2022
1%92%8%
3.81
Melonie Johnson
208W–150L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
4.5
AYESHA CURE
149W–86L career · 7 lines in 2022
98%2%<1%
3.74
Tanya Rhodes
140W–109L career · 3 lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.68
4
Audrey Vanhoose
101W–64L career · 6 lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.67
Therese McNea-Wiley
161W–137L career · 4 lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.58
4
Brian Thomeczek
68W–47L career · 2 lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.57
Todd Haines
97W–56L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%62%38%
3.46
Mike Ritze
209W–139L career · 11 lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.35
Kim LaPole
90W–168L career · 3 lines in 2022
52%48%<1%
2.99
Patricia Robinson
120W–269L career · 1 line in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.