Teams

MacOn/Knoxville

2025 Adult 18 & Over-Knoxville · 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.80 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-16vs McKeehan’s-Christen/KnoxvilleWon 31
W#1 SinglesLISA PETTY vs Ruthie Ivy6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesArielle Kilday / Sarah Palmquist vs Heather McKeehan / Jen Rose4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesJamie Hughes vs Emily Miner6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesGwynne MacOn / Emilie Harris vs Brooke Govert / Cassidy Hawkins1-6, 0-6
2025-05-10vs Grindstaff/KnoxvilleWon 31
W#1 DoublesGwynne MacOn / Stacy McIntosh vs Dawn Duke / Parker Casler6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesJamie Hughes vs Janet Jungclaus7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMegan Campbell / Sarah Palmquist vs Chelsea Grindstaff / Ashley Tipton6-0, 6-1
L#2 SinglesArielle Kilday vs Emma Poindexter0-6, 4-6
2025-04-26vs Grindstaff/KnoxvilleLost 01
L#1 DoublesLISA PETTY / Ellen Ritchey vs Emma Poindexter / Hailey Motter3-6, 2-6
2025-04-12vs McKeehan’s-Christen/KnoxvilleSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLISA PETTY / Stacy McIntosh vs Brooke Thurman / Maria Willard7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesEmilie Harris / Arielle Kilday vs Cassidy Hawkins / Emily Miner0-6, 2-6
2025-04-05vs Grindstaff/KnoxvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesGwynne MacOn / Arielle Kilday vs Allison Oaks / Dawn Duke6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJamie Hughes vs Joy Bray6-0, 6-2
L#2 SinglesLISA PETTY vs Hilary Brooks6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2025-03-22vs McKeehan’s-Christen/KnoxvilleLost 14
W#1 DoublesEllen Ritchey / Stacy McIntosh vs Cassidy Hawkins / Ashli Christen7-5, 6-4
L#1 SinglesJamie Hughes vs Sarah Olesiuk2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesGwynne MacOn / LISA PETTY vs Melissa Fuesting / Jen Rose3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesEmilie Harris vs Heather McKeehan1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesArielle Kilday / Sarah Palmquist vs Maria Willard / Annabel Sims3-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.95
Jamie Hughes
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.91
Stacy McIntosh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Ellen Ritchey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.55
Gwynne MacOn
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.53
LISA PETTY
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
2.39
Arielle Kilday
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
Emilie Harris
usually #2 Doubles 29%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 2.5
Sarah Palmquist
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Jamie Hughes
9W–1L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
2.95
Stacy McIntosh
20W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.91
3
Ellen Ritchey
14W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
2.88
3
Gwynne MacOn
4W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
2.55
LISA PETTY
9W–24L career · 5 lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
2.53
2.5
Arielle Kilday
3W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%80%20%
2.39
2.5
Emilie Harris
6W–9L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sarah Palmquist
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.