Teams

HARBOR BAY 40AW3.5A

2025 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 3.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-03-16vs CASTLEWOOD CC 40AW3.5AWon 10
W#1 DoublesSusan Chang / Katherine Hwang vs Andrea Reiners / Nancy Day6-4, 7-5
2025-03-08vs LANEY TA/DAVIE STADIUM 40AW3.5AWon 20
W#1 DoublesKatherine Hwang / Deidre Abrons vs LyLy Kim / Christine Kizziah6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesLily Boris vs Kelly Richardson6-3, 6-1
2025-02-23vs MONTE VISTA HS 40AW3.5CWon 10
W#2 DoublesKatherine Hwang / Pooja Tendulkar vs Mickie Kerr / Shawn Young6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2025-02-08vs CASTLEWOOD CC 40AW3.5AWon 10
W#3 DoublesKatherine Hwang / Fang Wong vs Sophie de Saint Pierre / Penny Lane6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Lynn Losande
published
3.43
Katherine Hwang
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.42
Natalie Chriss
published
3.38
Martha Stebbins
published
3.35
Deidre Abrons
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.34
Nicole Freese
published
3.28
Kay Kolos McCubbin
published
3.28
Pam Luo
published
3.27
Lily Boris
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.21
Christine Haskett
published 3.5
3.20
Jenifer Hoover
published
3.17
Rosalyn Moya
published
2.83
2.81
Dana Takahashi
published 3
Sara Bremer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nicole Freese + Katherine Hwang213 matchesnot enough data
Katherine Hwang + Natalie Chriss213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lynn Losande
7W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.58
Katherine Hwang
36W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
Natalie Chriss
16W–24L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.42
Martha Stebbins
6W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Deidre Abrons
14W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
Nicole Freese
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%13%
3.34
Kay Kolos McCubbin
17W–6L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Pam Luo
9W–4L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Lily Boris
10W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Christine Haskett
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Jenifer Hoover
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Rosalyn Moya
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
3
Catharina Koh-Mollet
12W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.83
3
Dana Takahashi
11W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
Sara Bremer
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.