Teams

WH Ballines FWL M18-8.0X

2025 WMI FWL USTA League Mixed 18&Over Weekend Leagues · WMI FWL M18&O 8.0 X (6 player)

22 players · average NTRP 4.50 / WESTERN MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-01-26vs PTC Patrick FWL M18-8.0XLost 12
L#1 DoublesSamuel Shnowske / Anna Carlin vs Claudia Gage / Matthew Thornsbury4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesDre Ballines / Mauri VanDenBerg vs Ron Patrick / Julie Ludden7-5, 6-1
L#3 DoublesPaul Cheng / Jalynn Schnr vs Ryan Miller / Jill Weiand2-6, 1-6
2025-01-12vs MC Hutton FWL M18-8.0XWon 21
L#1 DoublesPaul Cheng / Rebecca Potluri vs Audrey Saliga / Dan DeHaan2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAnna Carlin / Jon Hasper vs Albert O'Bryant / Carol Heinicke6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTerri Beattie / Elijah Wisser vs Isabel DiMoff / Mark Schultz6-1, 6-1
2024-12-15vs MVC Waypa FWL M18-8.0XLost 12
L#1 DoublesRebecca Potluri / John Hertel vs Alexis Ganop / Alex van de Steenoven3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMihir Joshi / Jalynn Schnr vs Kirk Gossett / Rose Waypa6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMarjori Cantwell / Jon Hasper vs Debbie Buchan / David Wiltjer6-3, 6-4
2024-11-17vs PTC Patrick FWL M18-8.0XWon 21
L#1 DoublesDre Ballines / Heather Ballines vs Michael Grix / Jill Weiand2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesTerri Beattie / Elijah Wisser vs Elizabeth Patrick / Ron Patrick7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSara Johnson / Nicholas Klak V vs Patrick Myers / Paulina Holmes6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2024-11-03vs MC Hutton FWL M18-8.0XLost 12
L#1 DoublesMichelle Molitor / Samuel Shnowske vs Sarah Abramson / Austin Brunner4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMarjori Cantwell / Roberto Martinez vs Audrey Saliga / Daniel Hillman5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesHeather Ballines / Dre Ballines vs Carol Heinicke / Albert O'Bryant6-4, 6-2
2024-10-27vs MVC Waypa FWL M18-8.0XWon 21
W#1 DoublesSamuel Shnowske / Michelle Molitor vs Debbie Buchan / Koby Gossett7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSara Johnson / Patrick Bruining vs Alexis Ganop / Alex van de Steenoven2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesTerri Beattie / Elijah Wisser vs Andrea Wolfe / Jeremy Andrick6-2, 6-4
2024-10-06vs PTC Patrick FWL M18-8.0XWon 30
W#1 DoublesJohn Hertel / Rebecca Potluri vs Matt Vander Eide / Paulina Holmes6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRoberto Martinez / Jalynn Schnr vs Brittnee Tomlin / Duc Duong7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDre Ballines / Mauri VanDenBerg vs Patrick Myers / Claudia Gage7-5, 6-4
2024-09-29vs MC Hutton FWL M18-8.0XWon 30
W#1 DoublesAnna Carlin / Mihir Joshi vs Austin Brunner / Sarah Abramson6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSamuel Shnowske / Marjori Cantwell vs Mark Schultz / Alisha Marvin6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesNichole Watts / Nicholas Klak V vs Albert O'Bryant / Carol Heinicke6-0, 6-0
2024-09-08vs MVC Waypa FWL M18-8.0XWon 21
W#1 DoublesJohn Hertel / Rebecca Potluri vs Jeremy Andrick / Andrea Wolfe6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesSara Johnson / Patrick Bruining vs Rose Waypa / Kirk Gossett6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTerri Beattie / Elijah Wisser vs Chase Berends / Debbie Buchan6-1, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WMI FWL M18&O 8.0 X (6 player) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.83 estimated across 21 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.74
Elijah Wisser
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
4.36
Nicholas Klak V
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.30
Mihir Joshi
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.24
Patrick Bruining
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.13
John Hertel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.12
Rebecca Potluri
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.10
Anna Carlin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.06
Jon Hasper
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.92
Kayla Monti
published
3.76
Samuel Shnowske
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.76
Nicolas Millet
published
3.76
Dre Ballines
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.68
Marjori Cantwell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.68
Mauri VanDenBerg
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.65
GEORGE CHANG
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.60
Jalynn Schnr
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.60
Michelle Molitor
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Heather Ballines
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.24
Terri Beattie
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.19
Paul Cheng
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.10
Nichole Watts
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roberto Martinez
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jalynn Schnr + Dre Ballines7457% games+13.2% vs expected
Dre Ballines + Heather Ballines6452% games−3.0% vs expected
Michelle Molitor + Samuel Shnowske2346% games−5.3% vs expected
Rebecca Potluri + Paul Cheng2346% games−7.3% vs expected
Elijah Wisser + Terri Beattie6063% gamesnot enough data
Anna Carlin + Jon Hasper5064% gamesnot enough data
Elijah Wisser + Nichole Watts314 matchesnot enough data
Rebecca Potluri + John Hertel314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Elijah Wisser
50W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.74
Nicholas Klak V
36W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%84%16%
4.36
Mihir Joshi
30W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
4.30
Patrick Bruining
44W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
4.24
John Hertel
33W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%17%83%
4.13
Rebecca Potluri
43W–30L career · 4 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
4.12
4.5
Anna Carlin
96W–28L career · 3 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
4.10
Jon Hasper
53W–10L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
4.06
Kayla Monti
37W–40L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.92
Samuel Shnowske
27W–22L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%92%4%
3.76
Nicolas Millet
47W–35L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.76
Dre Ballines
101W–51L career · 6 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.76
Marjori Cantwell
142W–100L career · 6 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Mauri VanDenBerg
75W–29L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
GEORGE CHANG
92W–83L career · 4 lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.65
Jalynn Schnr
104W–90L career · 3 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.60
Michelle Molitor
89W–73L career · 2 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.60
Heather Ballines
86W–57L career · 2 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.52
Terri Beattie
119W–131L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%92%3%
3.24
Paul Cheng
32W–56L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Nichole Watts
39W–38L career · 1 line in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10
Roberto Martinez
25W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.