Teams

DB - Townsend

2024 Alachua Adult 18 & Over - Winter Season · 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-04-07vs JTC - ThibaultSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJulie Sager / Marlene Townsend vs Carolyn Shinn / Kristina Ford3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTaiana Mendez / Irina Madorsky vs Madison Sagas / Abigail Foster4-6, 5-7
2024-04-06vs Alachua/Crawford/18&Over4.0WLost 02
L#2 DoublesTaiana Mendez / Irina Madorsky vs Jordan Davis / Wheeler Crawford4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesMarlene Townsend / Frances Revere vs Jenny Neelands / Samantha Penhale6-7, 2-6
2024-03-30vs JTC - ThibaultSplit 11
L#2 DoublesMarlene Townsend / Ching Zhou vs Alison Andrus / Madison Sagas3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJulie Long / Taiana Mendez vs Allison Shinn / Jigisha Shah6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2024-03-29vs Alachua/Crawford/18&Over4.0WLost 02
L#1 DoublesDebbie Bowers / Anna Ligman vs Rachel Rodriguez / Dawn Dean0-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesMarlene Townsend vs Tara Edelstein1-6, 2-6
2024-03-16vs JTC - ThibaultWon 21
W#1 DoublesDebbie Bowers / Ching Zhou vs Peggi Bockman / Kim Magee4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMarlene Townsend / Julie Sager vs Samantha Walton / Carolyn Shinn5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTammy Miller / Taiana Mendez vs Allison Shinn / Amanda Fuller6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2024-02-25vs Alachua/Crawford/18&Over4.0WWon 21
W#1 DoublesDebbie Bowers / Ching Zhou vs Samantha Penhale / Wheeler Crawford6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesIrina Madorsky / Julie Sager vs Jordan Davis / Caroline Hord6-1, 7-6
L#3 DoublesFrances Revere / Marlene Townsend vs Maria Curatolo / TARA BROMIRSKI1-6, 3-6
2024-02-21vs Alachua/Crawford/18&Over4.0WLost 12
W#1 DoublesTammy Miller / Julie Sager vs Jenny Neelands / Caroline Hord6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesIrina Madorsky / Susannah Peddie vs Lynn Godwin / TARA BROMIRSKI4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDebbie Bowers / Frances Revere vs Heather Gibson / Tara Edelstein2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2024-02-03vs JTC - ThibaultWon 20
W#1 DoublesDebbie Bowers / Anna Ligman vs Mary Cribb / Lindsey Wilson6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJulie Sager / Irina Madorsky vs Caroli Harkness / Allison Shinn7-5, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.10
Julie Sager
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.77
Tammy Miller
published
Debbie Bowers
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.54
Taiana Mendez
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.50
Frances Revere
published 4
3.45
Irina Madorsky
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.45
Pam Kelly
published
3.29
Marlene Townsend
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.99
Julie Long
published
Susannah Peddie
published
Valerie de Crecy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Irina Madorsky + Julie Sager13756% games+3.9% vs expected
Marlene Townsend + Julie Sager5258% gamesnot enough data
Marlene Townsend + Irina Madorsky123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Julie Sager
182W–66L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%21%79%
4.10
Tammy Miller
4W–7L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Debbie Bowers
25W–26L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Taiana Mendez
23W–37L career · 4 lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
3.54
4
Frances Revere
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
3.50
4
Irina Madorsky
222W–180L career · 5 lines in 2024
64%36%<1%
3.45
Pam Kelly
5W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
3.45
Marlene Townsend
181W–153L career · 10 lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.29
Julie Long
5W–9L career · no lines in 2024
54%46%<1%
2.99
Susannah Peddie
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Valerie de Crecy
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.