Teams

Team Selma - Williams

2024 Selma Southern Combo Doubles 18's · Women's 7.5

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-10-05vs Selma - HenryWon 21
W#1 DoublesMichelle Pearce / Callen Free vs Bradford Brackin / Rebecca Stewart6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRebecca Youngblood / Sid Utsey vs Kim Simpkins / Leigh Chappelle6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesLilly Youngblood / Katie Barrette vs Amanda Henry / Rachel Todd3-6, 2-6
2024-10-02vs Selma - HenryWon 30
W#1 DoublesJenni Payne / Keisha Wilson vs Amanda Henry / Kim Simpkins6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMary Ashlyn Pearce / Sid Utsey vs Leigh Chappelle / Kim Pierson6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAshley Williams / Katie Barrette vs Rebecca Stewart / Rachel Todd6-2, 6-0
2024-09-29vs Selma - HenryWon 21
W#1 DoublesCallen Free / Michelle Pearce vs Amanda Henry / Rachel Todd6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSid Utsey / Ashley Williams vs Bradford Brackin / Rebecca Stewart4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesKeisha Wilson / Rebecca Youngblood vs Leigh Chappelle / Landon Posey6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Jenni Payne
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.64
Mary Ashlyn Pearce
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.44
Sid Utsey
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.30
Callen Free
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Keisha Wilson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.18
Katie Barrette
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Lilly Youngblood
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Michelle Pearce
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Pearce + Callen Free404 matchesnot enough data
Katie Barrette + Sid Utsey044 matchesnot enough data
Keisha Wilson + Sid Utsey303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jenni Payne
39W–17L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%4%96%
3.74
Mary Ashlyn Pearce
8W–9L career · 1 line in 2024
16%84%1%
3.64
Sid Utsey
27W–20L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Callen Free
8W–1L career · type A · 2 lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.30
Keisha Wilson
18W–10L career · 4 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
Katie Barrette
6W–14L career · 6 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Lilly Youngblood
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Michelle Pearce
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.