Teams

6-LBible-UNC

2023 Eno River Combo 18 & Over · Eno River 18 & Over Combo 2.5 Women Evening

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-09-28vs 2-KGreen-EnoLost 01
L#1 DoublesPatsy Park / Leah Sansbury vs Sandra Stowe / Mina Kobayashi3-6, 4-6
2023-09-14vs 3-JYoung-Eno 2.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesLindsay Mize / Patsy Park vs Liz Schaller / Shannon Bartle6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2023-09-06Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLindsay Mize / Patsy Park vs Sandra Stowe / Juliana Maul5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2023-08-31vs 4-AJarvis-CHTCLost 01
L#1 DoublesAlison Sweeney / Patsy Park vs Amber Jarvis / Lizzy Burch1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Eno River 18 & Over Combo 2.5 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Loralie Bible
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.32
Courtney Mills
published 3
3.00
Lindsay Mize
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.86
Patsy Park
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.68
Lucy McMillan
published
2.56
Laura Dubois
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.31
Virginia Wang
published
2.13
Leah Sansbury
published
2.03
1.90
Elisa Klein
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Loralie Bible + Lindsay Mize10269% games+14.6% vs expected
Lindsay Mize + Patsy Park5460% games+3.9% vs expected
Loralie Bible + Lucy McMillan5061% gamesnot enough data
Lucy McMillan + Patsy Park134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Loralie Bible
186W–65L career · 12 lines in 2023
<1%35%65%
3.55
3
Courtney Mills
33W–22L career · no lines in 2023
<1%1%99%
3.32
3
Lindsay Mize
111W–61L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%49%51%
3.00
3
Patsy Park
43W–45L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
2.86
Lucy McMillan
17W–17L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
2.68
3
Laura Dubois
82W–106L career · type A · 7 lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
2.56
Virginia Wang
14W–11L career · no lines in 2023
0%93%7%
2.31
Leah Sansbury
3W–9L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Suzanne Carroll Woodard
0W–14L career · no lines in 2023
>99%<1%<1%
2.03
2.5
Elisa Klein
1W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
1.90

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.