Teams

Thompson

2026 KS 65 & Over Adult League · 6.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / KANSAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 6.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.90
Paula Bette
published
2.85
Bobbie Lee
published 3
Dana Hill
published 3
Deb Frost
published 3
2.74
Patricia Thompson
published
2.73
Debra Ferris
published 3
2.64
Cynthia Pfeiffer
published 3
2.45
Jodi Blair
published
Kathy Barkes
published
Kathy Hof
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debra Ferris + Dana Hill7647% games+0.9% vs expected
Bobbie Lee + Patricia Thompson8752% games−1.3% vs expected
Bobbie Lee + Debra Ferris2442% games−8.3% vs expected
Patricia Thompson + Paula Bette033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Paula Bette
83W–65L career · no lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
2.90
3
Bobbie Lee
61W–61L career · no lines in 2026
1%85%14%
2.85
3
Dana Hill
17W–31L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Deb Frost
0W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Patricia Thompson
81W–68L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Debra Ferris
24W–28L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Cynthia Pfeiffer
22W–43L career · no lines in 2026
15%84%1%
2.64
Jodi Blair
17W–34L career · no lines in 2026
63%37%<1%
2.45
Kathy Barkes
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Kathy Hof
23W–35L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.