Teams

LOCH.Newsome

2023 CTRL Tri-Level 18 & Over · Tri-Level 4.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-13vs TOC.SachanSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBen Freeman / Everett Laborde vs Mohit Bhatnagar / Amrit Narula4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesChristopher Wooten / Daryn Watson vs Paul Narula / Doug Griswold6-1, 6-2
2023-07-07vs TOC.PuriLost 01
L#2 DoublesDavid Werk / Daryn Watson vs Asim Javaid / Vishal Gupta1-6, 0-6
2023-07-06vs TOC.DosslinWon 10
W#1 DoublesEverett Laborde / Ben Freeman vs Doug Schoelzel / Christopher Shelton6-2, 6-3
2023-06-08vs TOC.KalluruLost 02
L#2 DoublesDaryn Watson / Jason Fu vs AJAY VARMA GANAPATHIRAJU / Jagan Puttoju4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesStephen Fu / Keith Kasberg vs Arun Kumar / Ravi Karanam6-7, 0-6
2023-06-01vs LOCH.MurphySplit 11
L#1 DoublesEverett Laborde / Pedro Torrejon vs Kevin Mcdonald / Jeff Cockayne2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKeith Kasberg / Stephen Fu vs Kenneth Waters / Bob Cwikla6-1, 2-6, 1-0
2023-05-30vs TOC.SachanLost 02
L#2 DoublesDaryn Watson / David Werk vs Amit Sachan / Paul Narula5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesStephen Fu / Keith Kasberg vs Jay Thakkar / Doug Griswold6-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Tri-Level 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Everett Laborde
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.48
Pedro Torrejon
published
3.29
Jay Cutler
published
Christopher Wooten
published 3.5
3.11
Daryn Watson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Charles Newsome
published 3.5
3.07
Gustavo Abrantes
published 3
3.05
Stephen Fu
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.65
Keith Kasberg
published
2.52
John Mcalpin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Keith Kasberg + John Mcalpin213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Everett Laborde
89W–62L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
Pedro Torrejon
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
57%43%<1%
3.48
Jay Cutler
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Christopher Wooten
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Daryn Watson
36W–80L career · 4 lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.11
3.5
Charles Newsome
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.08
3
Gustavo Abrantes
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%29%71%
3.07
3.5
Stephen Fu
75W–130L career · 3 lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.05
Keith Kasberg
3W–13L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%<1%
2.65
John Mcalpin
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
44%56%<1%
2.52

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.