Teams

CVTA YELLOW

2024 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT

8 players · average NTRP 3.38 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-09-05Won 20
W#1 DoublesSarah Abernathey / Linda Levy vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesAlice Madden vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-08-29vs TTA BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesElowyn Rich / Melissa Balcerak vs Janice Cook / Casey Ahn-O'Connor4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 SinglesSarah Abernathey vs Morgan Fischer6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesLinda Levy / Janet Ryden vs Heather Petryna / Madison Fischer5-7, 3-6
2024-08-22vs RCC BLUELost 02
L#1 DoublesElowyn Rich / Melissa Balcerak vs Torey Kirkpatrick / Lisa Highley3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesSally Vander Veer / Nancy Hiester vs Lisa Corken / Tayrien Holocher0-6, 1-6
2024-08-15vs BCC GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesMelissa Balcerak / Sally Vander Veer vs Allison Faldi / Christine Gould3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesSarah Abernathey vs Brooke Harrison6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLinda Levy / Janet Ryden vs Lindsey Stroiman / Mary Pfeiffer1-6, 4-6
2024-08-13vs LTA-Q ORANGEWon 30
W#1 DoublesMelissa Balcerak / Sally Vander Veer vs Alicia Hillen / Sarah White6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesAlice Madden vs Kate Moin6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSarah Abernathey / Janet Ryden vs Jennifer Millican / Mia Morrison6-2, 6-4
2024-08-08vs LTA-Q SILVERLost 12
L#1 DoublesMelissa Balcerak / Sally Vander Veer vs Linda Ducay / Danielle Murphy5-7, 2-6
W#1 SinglesSarah Abernathey vs Carly Mayer2-1
L#2 DoublesNancy Hiester / Janet Ryden vs Sherry Cree / Alexandra Sufrin2-6, 3-6
2024-07-25vs TTA BLUEWon 30
W#1 DoublesMelissa Balcerak / Elowyn Rich vs Lindsay Madden / Morgan Fischer6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesSarah Abernathey vs Madison Fischer6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesNancy Hiester / Sally Vander Veer vs Heather Petryna / Janice Cook6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings43 teams · WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LEBTC YELLOW701838107
2RRTC PURPLE6118311144
3VC RED6115616157
4LEBTC BLACK6115617166
5CCV YELLOW6114719167
6RRTC YELLOW5216513132
7CACM SILVER5215615157
8KNO PURPLE5215616165
9MVCC YELLOW5214717161
10CCC BLUE5214718164
11NJ WHITE5214718176
12GR YELLOW5213819179
13BRMST SILVER5212919175
14PH PINK5213820187
15TTA PURPLE52111023160
16DTP ORANGE4314716149
17PRC PURPLE4312921198
18WC WHITE43111022172
19MVCC GOLD43111023169
20FOX GREEN43111024199
21CCC RED43101125187
22PCC RED43101126205
23WP-O YELLOW43101126192
24VCC PURPLE3371123180
25CPCC ORANGE34111022168
26CVTA PURPLE34101125196
27GPTC NAVY34101126200
28GCC NAVY3481327208
29CVTA YELLOW3491227200
30LPTC TEAL3491228216
31PRKR WHITE3491228194
32DTP BLUE3481329209
33CHCC GREEN3461532228
34RMTC NAVY2581329216
35EM PINK2571430219
36LTA-Q GOLD2581331210
37WP-G ORANGE2571433229
38SKY GOLD2551634230
39GR BLACK1671428189
40SS-LT PURPLE1651633229
41CR-BP YELLOW1631836224
42TTA SILVER0761532209
43RHCC YELLOW0751635232

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Alice Madden
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Sarah Abernathey
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.12
Elowyn Rich
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Linda Levy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Sally Vander Veer
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.87
Melissa Balcerak
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Janet Ryden
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Nancy Hiester
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elowyn Rich + Sally Vander Veer4355% games+5.6% vs expected
Linda Levy + Janet Ryden101248% games−0.4% vs expected
Melissa Balcerak + Linda Levy0633% games−3.0% vs expected
Elowyn Rich + Melissa Balcerak81444% games−5.5% vs expected
Melissa Balcerak + Sally Vander Veer4544% games−5.9% vs expected
Sally Vander Veer + Nancy Hiester123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Alice Madden
88W–41L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Sarah Abernathey
41W–50L career · 6 lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Elowyn Rich
24W–38L career · 3 lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.12
Linda Levy
57W–71L career · 2 lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.10
Sally Vander Veer
40W–45L career · 5 lines in 2024
55%45%<1%
2.98
3
Melissa Balcerak
35W–58L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%84%15%
2.87
Janet Ryden
15W–20L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Nancy Hiester
21W–32L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.