Teams

MCTA18/Vazquez/RHTC

Adult 18 & Over · 18 & Over Adult Men - 4.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.94 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-03-29vs MCTA 4.0M 18 & Over (Siens)Lost 04
L#1 DoublesKevin Ferreira / Joseph Cochran vs Jacob Huffaker / Jordan Teel4-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesDavis Dickey vs Peter Juran1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDanny Vazquez / John Hasty vs Nate Siens / Maxwell Kenny2-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesGustavo Teixeira vs Jeffrey Steed1-6, 4-6
2026-03-22vs MCTA 4.0M 18 & Over (Siens)Lost 23
W#1 DoublesJoseph Cochran / Daniel Latzke vs Joshua Mu / Daniel Nunn6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesGustavo Teixeira vs Sean Karasik6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKevin Ferreira / Tiger Zhang vs Jordan Teel / Patrick Nitsche4-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesWill Leisey vs Peter Juran6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMichal Jarzynski / Benjamin Shamanis vs Jose Paez / Jeffrey Steed4-6, 1-6
2026-03-21vs MCTA 4.0M 18 & Over (Siens)Lost 23
L#1 DoublesVikram Kapoor / Kevin Ferreira vs Patrick Nitsche / James Nichols2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesDavis Dickey vs Sean O'Brien7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBenjamin Shamanis / Michal Jarzynski vs Brendan Molan / Daniel Nunn5-7, 5-7
L#2 SinglesDalton Grove vs Jeremy Chen4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJoseph Cochran / Daniel Latzke vs Joshua Mu / Jose Paez1-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-03-16vs MCTA 4.0M 18 & Over (Siens)Won 30
W#1 DoublesJoseph Cochran / Kevin Ferreira vs Sean Karasik / Jeffrey Steed7-5, 7-5
W#1 SinglesDavis Dickey vs Peter Juran6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMichal Jarzynski / John Hasty vs Bryan Skelton / Jordan Teel7-5, 6-4
2026-03-01vs MCTA 4.0M 18 & Over (Siens)Lost 23
W#1 DoublesKevin Ferreira / Tiger Zhang vs Nate Siens / Maxwell Kenny3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesChristopher Northrop vs Jeremy Chen4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJoseph Cochran / Atiba Rodriguez vs Sean O'Brien / Joshua Mu1-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesDavis Dickey vs Jeffrey Steed6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesSteven Inga / Vikram Kapoor vs James Nichols / Brendan Molan3-6, 3-6
2026-02-22vs MCTA 4.0M 18 & Over (Siens)Won 32
W#1 DoublesKevin Ferreira / Joseph Cochran vs Bryan Skelton / Jeffrey Steed6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesChristopher Northrop vs Sean O'Brien7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMichal Jarzynski / Benjamin Shamanis vs Daniel Nunn / Joshua Mu3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 SinglesDavis Dickey vs Peter Juran7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTiger Zhang / Will Leisey vs Jordan Teel / Sean Karasik3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-02-17vs MCTA 4.0M 18 & Over (Siens)Lost 23
L#1 DoublesWill Leisey / John Hasty vs Daniel Nunn / Brendan Molan3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAtiba Rodriguez vs Jeffrey Steed6-0, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesGustavo Teixeira / Vikram Kapoor vs Patrick Nitsche / Joshua Mu3-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesDanny Vazquez vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKevin Ferreira / Joseph Cochran vs Jacob Huffaker / Nate Siens0-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult Men - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.22
Daniel Latzke
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.87
Christopher Northrop
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.86
Benjamin Shamanis
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.85
Davis Dickey
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 4
3.84
Michal Jarzynski
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.81
Joseph Cochran
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.71
Gustavo Teixeira
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.69
Will Leisey
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.68
Atiba Rodriguez
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.68
Tiger Zhang
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.58
Dalton Grove
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.57
Kevin Ferreira
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
3.54
John Hasty
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.54
Steven Inga
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.51
Danny Vazquez
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
Vikram Kapoor
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kevin Ferreira + Joseph Cochran6256% games+11.8% vs expected
Michal Jarzynski + Benjamin Shamanis171254% games+9.0% vs expected
Kevin Ferreira + Steven Inga6358% games+8.0% vs expected
Joseph Cochran + Daniel Latzke6163% gamesnot enough data
Kevin Ferreira + Tiger Zhang123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Daniel Latzke
9W–3L career · type D · 2 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
4.22
4
Christopher Northrop
101W–60L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.87
4
Benjamin Shamanis
76W–43L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%86%13%
3.86
4
Davis Dickey
9W–1L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
<1%87%12%
3.85
4
Michal Jarzynski
80W–83L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%89%11%
3.84
Joseph Cochran
74W–26L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Gustavo Teixeira
36W–34L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%93%1%
3.71
Will Leisey
9W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Atiba Rodriguez
142W–112L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.68
Tiger Zhang
43W–26L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.68
3.5
Dalton Grove
15W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%27%73%
3.58
Kevin Ferreira
40W–19L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%30%70%
3.57
John Hasty
33W–21L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%38%62%
3.54
Steven Inga
23W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
38%62%<1%
3.54
3.5
Danny Vazquez
70W–48L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
3.51
Vikram Kapoor
4W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.