Teams

LA - Get a Grip

2022 SoCal Doubles - LA · LA - Women 3.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-12-10vs LA-LLW-Dare Doubles-Karen ChouLost 01
L#3 DoublesCindy Shih / Cynthia Wood vs Stefanie Hall / Dorothy Kim0-6, 4-6
2022-12-03vs LA - Queen AnneLost 01
L#1 DoublesMarissa Pearson / Cindy Shih vs Diana Chow / Eriana Blankinship2-6, 2-6
2022-11-19vs LA - Ball BustersLost 01
L#1 DoublesCindy Shih / Geraldine Farrell vs Casey Hwang Martin / Jo Ann Thrailkill3-6, 4-6
2022-11-12vs LA - JBeesWon 10
W#3 DoublesCindy Shih / Laura Winslow vs Ada Ramirez / Judith Ortiz6-0, 6-2
2022-11-05vs LA - Sure ShotsLost 01
L#3 DoublesCindy Shih / Rene Farah vs Melanie Boston / Soo Fujishige0-6, 6-7
2022-10-09vs LA - Shadow's AcesLost 01
L#3 DoublesRene Farah / Bobbe Gilbert vs Sara Herta / Sophia Chang1-6, 1-6
2022-09-24vs LA - Downtown AcesWon 10
W#3 DoublesMichelle Johnson / Cindy Shih vs Ellen Rosen / Linda Gase6-3, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.94
Bethany Nelson
published 3
2.87
Rene Farah
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.86
2.79
Cindy Shih
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Bobbe Gilbert
published 3
2.74
Laura Winslow
published
2.67
Marissa Pearson
published
2.64
Marcia Berman
published
2.59
Cathy Chermak
published 3
2.50
Cecilia Terasaki
published 3
Leslie Wright
published
Lisa Kalin
published
Sunhee Paik
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rene Farah + Bethany Nelson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Bethany Nelson
19W–17L career · no lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
2.94
3
Rene Farah
46W–24L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
Geraldine Farrell
11W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
Cindy Shih
69W–99L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.79
3
Bobbe Gilbert
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Laura Winslow
10W–7L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
2.74
Marissa Pearson
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
2.67
Marcia Berman
8W–16L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
2.64
3
Cathy Chermak
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
2.59
3
Cecilia Terasaki
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
49%51%<1%
2.50
Leslie Wright
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lisa Kalin
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sunhee Paik
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.