Teams

WNCB Bowie (HRC)

Tri-Level 55 & Over NC WNC 2023 · Women 4.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-07-27vs WNCP Harris (CS)Won 10
W#2 DoublesTLynn Gilpin / Laurie Guinn vs Pamela Harris / Carolyn Marzendorfer7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2023-07-13vs WNCB Weinland (HRC)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesTLynn Gilpin / Sharlyn Aamodt vs Susan Hoffman / Kenna Armstrong2-6, 3-6
2023-06-08vs WNCB Weinland (HRC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesTLynn Gilpin / Heidi Zehr vs Dottie Mattern / Susan Laborde4-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Cindy Bull
published 4
3.75
Shari Rawet
published
3.42
TLynn Gilpin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.41
Shelby Pedersen
published
3.36
Heidi Zehr
published 3.5
3.35
Sharlyn Aamodt
published
3.31
Laurie Guinn
published
3.21
Roberta Heinrich
published
3.10
Brenda Bowie
published 3.5
2.94
Karen Watson
published
2.90
Sheri Sparks
published
Heidi Hendrix
published 3
Jeanette Wayne
published
Sharon Purcell
published
Tracy McKenna
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Roberta Heinrich + Laurie Guinn123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cindy Bull
37W–19L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.82
Shari Rawet
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.75
3.5
TLynn Gilpin
291W–221L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.42
Shelby Pedersen
23W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Heidi Zehr
9W–22L career · no lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
3.36
Sharlyn Aamodt
18W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%12%
3.35
Laurie Guinn
8W–14L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.31
Roberta Heinrich
10W–21L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Brenda Bowie
9W–20L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.10
Karen Watson
19W–22L career · no lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
2.94
Sheri Sparks
14W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Heidi Hendrix
1W–2L career · type T · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jeanette Wayne
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sharon Purcell
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tracy McKenna
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.