Teams

GJTC PKNAYSI

2022 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - WS · MEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER - WS

11 players · average NTRP 3.30 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-05-17vs GJTC SKEARLWon 10
W#2 SinglesMatthew Charts vs Louis Anderson6-3, 6-2
2022-05-03vs GJTC SKEARLWon 10
W#1 DoublesMatthew Charts / Scott Collister vs Scott Powell / Sam Kearl6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2022-04-28vs GJTC SKEARLLost 01
L#1 DoublesLarry Hasler / Matthew Charts vs Levi Crespin / Karsten Bump3-6, 1-6
2022-04-19vs GJTC SKEARLLost 01
L#1 DoublesSid Nittala / Matthew Charts vs Scott Powell / Matt Burgess5-7, 3-6
2022-04-12vs GJTC SKEARLLost 01
L#2 SinglesMatthew Charts vs Karsten Bump4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2022-04-11vs GJTC SKEARLLost 01
L#3 DoublesBruce DeRush / Matthew Charts vs Karsten Bump / Stan Scott3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER - WS have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Paul Knaysi
published 3.5
3.07
Jimmy Hillan
published 3.5
3.04
Joseph Harawi
published 3.5
2.98
Matthew Charts
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.69
Doug Larson
published 3
2.28
Scott Collister
published
Bruce DeRush
published
Bruce Marvin
published
Larry Hasler
published
Scott Doughty
published
Sid Nittala
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Larry Hasler + Scott Doughty123 matchesnot enough data
Doug Larson + Matthew Charts303 matchesnot enough data
Scott Collister + Matthew Charts123 matchesnot enough data
Paul Knaysi + Bruce Marvin213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Paul Knaysi
60W–63L career · type A · no lines in 2022
16%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Jimmy Hillan
37W–35L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.07
3.5
Joseph Harawi
46W–49L career · type A · no lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
3.04
3
Matthew Charts
63W–41L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%57%43%
2.98
3
Doug Larson
38W–43L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69
Scott Collister
6W–37L career · no lines in 2022
95%5%<1%
2.28
Bruce DeRush
2W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Bruce Marvin
6W–10L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Larry Hasler
8W–34L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Scott Doughty
9W–15L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sid Nittala
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.