Teams

Park-Matilda PDX

2022 One Doubles · 3.0 Women

3 players · average NTRP 3.33 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Kayla Casebeer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Mihee Park
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.08
Betty Roux
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Results7 ties
2022-08-12Won 10
W#1 DoublesAbbie Hover / Betty Roux vs Manisha Thakkar / Adela Dalmau6-0, 6-2
2022-08-08Won 10
W#1 DoublesMihee Park / Abbie Hover vs Victoria Cartwright / Kerri Patrick6-1, 6-2
2022-08-02Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKayla Casebeer / Mihee Park vs Christine Bennett-Hanes / Jennifer Stevenson2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-07-22Won 10
W#1 DoublesMihee Park / Abbie Hover vs Dipali Dixit / Ann-Marie Lundberg6-2, 6-3
2022-07-11Lost 01
L#1 DoublesWanda Ng / Betty Roux vs Karen Kraus / Sarah Larson6-4, 6-4
2022-07-01Won 10
W#1 DoublesWanda Ng / Kayla Casebeer vs Lillian Lee / Lisa McBee6-0, 6-2
2022-06-28Won 10
W#1 DoublesAbbie Hover / Mihee Park vs Kelly Goodman / Elizabeth Ayotte6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Kayla Casebeer
93W–63L career
not enough data
3
Mihee Park
147W–89L career
0%23%77%
3.20
3.5
Betty Roux
101W–106L career · type A
18%82%0%
3.08

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.