Teams

SFV-LLW - Ade Too - Ade Quingco

SFV-Adult 55 & Over · SFV Women 7.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.58 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-08-29vs SFV Passing ShotsSplit 11
W#2 DoublesCaprina Auyong / Janice Miller vs Joanne Carlsen / Renee Cotter6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesRieko Gambrel / Carrie Gasper vs Sue Anderson / Connie Benveniste6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2021-08-27vs SFV Always Causing A RacquetWon 20
W#1 DoublesChristine Sauceda / Caprina Auyong vs Cheryl Hughart / Tracy Kuncar2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAdele Slaughter / Carrie Gasper vs Manuela Marino / Bertha ODonnell6-4, 6-2
2021-08-21vs SFV Passing ShotsWon 10
W#1 DoublesAdele Slaughter / Carrie Gasper vs Connie Benveniste / Joanne Carlsen6-2, 6-2
2021-08-08vs SFV Always Causing A RacquetLost 01
L#2 DoublesPat Guttormsen / Caprina Auyong vs Vivian Hill / Karen Watts2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2021-07-25vs SFV Passing ShotsWon 10
W#1 DoublesChristine Sauceda / Caprina Auyong vs Joanne Carlsen / Connie Benveniste7-6, 6-2
2021-07-11vs SFV Always Causing A RacquetWon 10
W#3 DoublesRieko Gambrel / Carrie Gasper vs Bertha ODonnell / Manuela Marino6-2, 6-1
2021-06-13vs SFV Passing ShotsWon 10
W#1 DoublesPat Guttormsen / Caprina Auyong vs Connie Benveniste / Joanne Carlsen1-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV Women 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Elena Salinas
published 4
3.16
Adele Slaughter
published 3.5
3.16
Carrie Gasper
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.07
Christine Sauceda
published 3.5
3.06
Caprina Auyong
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.06
Pat Guttormsen
published
3.05
Karen El-Kara
published
2.83
Ade Quingco
published 3.5
Linda Matsumoto
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carrie Gasper + Elena Salinas1438% gamesnot enough data
Caprina Auyong + Carrie Gasper134 matchesnot enough data
Christine Sauceda + Karen El-Kara134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Elena Salinas
140W–158L career · no lines in 2021
55%45%<1%
3.48
3.5
Adele Slaughter
163W–167L career · no lines in 2021
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Carrie Gasper
189W–211L career · 4 lines in 2021
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Christine Sauceda
3W–4L career · no lines in 2021
29%71%<1%
3.07
3.5
Caprina Auyong
86W–81L career · 5 lines in 2021
32%68%<1%
3.06
Pat Guttormsen
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
33%67%<1%
3.06
Karen El-Kara
2W–10L career · no lines in 2021
36%64%<1%
3.05
3.5
Ade Quingco
0W–6L career · no lines in 2021
90%10%<1%
2.83
Linda Matsumoto
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.