Teams

HOA/Stroede/40&Over4.0M

2021 Adult 40 & Over 3.0 - 4.5 - Weekend · 4.0 Men

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / HEART OF AMERICA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2021-02-27vs HOA/HolsingerWC/40&Over4.0MSplit 22
L#1 DoublesJan Claussen / Jeff Ganaden vs Kevin Harlan / Earl Pardo4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesDuane Strader vs Jon Joffe6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRavi Peru / John Stroede vs Jeb Graham / Shawn Perkins6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMitchell Bennett / Jeff Thimgan vs John Kotre / Gregory Mott6-3, 6-2
2021-02-20vs Pucci, MichaelWon 31
W#1 DoublesJan Claussen / Ravi Peru vs Dan Johnson / Michael Pucci6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJeff Ganaden vs Scott Kirsch6-3, 5-5
L#2 DoublesJohn Stroede / R Scott Hanover vs Joseph Ubalde / James Dawkins4-6, 5-6
W#3 DoublesMitchell Bennett / Jeff Thimgan vs Norman Friedman / Sam Cargnel6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
Jeff Thimgan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.85
Ravi Peru
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.81
Mitchell Bennett
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.76
Jan Claussen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Brian Hutchin
published 4
3.72
Jeff Ganaden
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.70
Duane Strader
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.67
Shawn Beelman
published
3.67
John Stroede
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.61
Brandon Willett
published 4
3.19
Michael Shinn
published
R Scott Hanover
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ravi Peru + Shawn Beelman5360% games+14.5% vs expected
John Stroede + Brandon Willett8256% games+7.6% vs expected
Mitchell Bennett + Jan Claussen5354% games+5.5% vs expected
Mitchell Bennett + John Stroede4356% games+5.0% vs expected
Shawn Beelman + Jan Claussen6062% games+4.1% vs expected
Mitchell Bennett + Jeff Thimgan22560% games+4.1% vs expected
Jeff Ganaden + Jan Claussen91248% games−0.6% vs expected
John Stroede + Duane Strader8557% games−1.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeff Thimgan
87W–70L career · 2 lines in 2021
45%55%<1%
4.01
Ravi Peru
55W–33L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%87%13%
3.85
Mitchell Bennett
174W–74L career · 2 lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Jan Claussen
91W–71L career · 2 lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Brian Hutchin
18W–11L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Jeff Ganaden
118W–94L career · 2 lines in 2021
5%94%2%
3.72
4
Duane Strader
105W–73L career · 1 line in 2021
6%93%1%
3.70
Shawn Beelman
63W–48L career · no lines in 2021
9%90%1%
3.67
John Stroede
61W–63L career · 3 lines in 2021
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Brandon Willett
74W–53L career · no lines in 2021
20%80%<1%
3.61
Michael Shinn
37W–68L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.19
R Scott Hanover
30W–36L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.