Teams

Jell-O Shots

Fire & Ice 2025 - NA · Fire & Ice 3.0 Division

13 players · average NTRP 2.58 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-12-07vs Sleigh All DayLost 12
W#1 DoublesSara Rohan / Jessica Shipley vs Jennifer Adams / Stacy Gallo6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNathalie Edwards / Paulina Fernandez vs Jackie Kemp / Elaine Taylor0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMichelle Gonzaba / Arianna Garcia vs Holly Nelson / Sara Traugott0-6, 0-6
2025-12-06vs ComadrAce Fire and IceLost 03
L#1 DoublesSara Rohan / Emily Price vs Raquel Gomez / SELINA TREVINO2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesPaulina Fernandez / Jessica Shipley vs Ioana Tietzsch / Roxanna Gonzalez Muzza4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesArianna Garcia / Anjelica Scott vs Pamela Vinals / Pravina Mulchand1-6, 0-6
2025-12-05vs Slay BellesLost 03
L#1 DoublesFELISE de NOVO / Sara Rohan vs Lauren Johnson / Johanna Suttle6-1, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAnjelica Scott / Brittni Schuster vs Stephanie Hankins / Kelly McAlear2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLydia Bederka / Ashley Metke vs Laurie Winters / Brittany Taylor2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fire & Ice 3.0 Division have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.42 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.95
FELISE de NOVO
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.79
Sara Rohan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Jessica Shipley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.53
Julie Gerron
published
2.44
Paulina Fernandez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.31
Lydia Bederka
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.29
Michelle Gonzaba
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.29
Ashley Metke
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Arianna Garcia
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.22
Anjelica Scott
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.10
Elda Pena
published 2.5
2.00
Brittni Schuster
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Nathalie Edwards
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paulina Fernandez + Jessica Shipley2739% games−2.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
FELISE de NOVO
7W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%66%34%
2.95
Sara Rohan
12W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
2.79
Jessica Shipley
7W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
2.69
Julie Gerron
2W–14L career · no lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
2.53
Paulina Fernandez
3W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
2.44
Lydia Bederka
3W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
93%7%<1%
2.31
Michelle Gonzaba
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
94%6%<1%
2.29
2.5
Ashley Metke
1W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
0%94%6%
2.29
2.5
Arianna Garcia
0W–3L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Anjelica Scott
0W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.22
2.5
Elda Pena
2W–16L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.10
2.5
Brittni Schuster
0W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.00
Nathalie Edwards
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.