Teams

Bret Peterson-YTC-Tuesday-FLEX

2025 Auburn Flex League Fall · Tuesday Night FLEX - Men

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-12-10vs Jim Lessley-YTC-Tuesday-FLEXLost 23
L#1 DoublesBret Peterson / Matt Schneller vs Janaki Alavalapati / Robert Scofield7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLee Bryan / Dan Hart vs James League / James Lessley2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJosh Ehrhorn / Michael Curvey vs Joe Wilkinson / Parker van Dyke7-6, 0-6, 1-0
W#4 DoublesGrant Kirby / Eric Olsen vs Mark Murphy / Jason Bryant6-3, 7-5
L#5 DoublesMark Lovell / Amrut Sadachar vs David Hester / Kevan Bizilia6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2024-12-03vs Jim Lessley-YTC-Tuesday-FLEXLost 23
W#1 DoublesGrant Kirby / William Heaton vs Ronnie Forrest / Lamar Daniels6-0, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAmrut Sadachar / Eric Olsen vs Lamar Daniels III / Scott Wilder6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSteve Guenther / John Oliver vs Kevan Bizilia / David Hester7-5, 6-3
L#4 DoublesLee Bryan / Matt Schneller vs Janaki Alavalapati / James Lessley2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#5 DoublesMark Lovell / Wei Wang vs Mark Murphy / Bob Reynods6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2024-11-12vs Jim Lessley-YTC-Tuesday-FLEXLost 14
L#1 DoublesMatt Schneller / Bret Peterson vs James League / Robert Scofield1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLee Bryan / Dan Hart vs Janaki Alavalapati / James Lessley3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesWilliam Heaton / Amrut Sadachar vs Bob Reynods / Zach Walsh0-6, 1-6
W#4 DoublesMark Lovell / Eric Olsen vs Kevan Bizilia / David Hester6-2, 6-2
L#6 DoublesSteve Guenther / Michael Curvey vs Parker van Dyke / Lamar Daniels III6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2024-11-05vs Jim Lessley-YTC-Tuesday-FLEXLost 05
L#1 DoublesMatt Schneller / Bret Peterson vs James Lessley / Robert Scofield3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDan Hart / Lee Bryan vs James League / Zach Walsh6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMark Lovell / Amrut Sadachar vs Mark Murphy / Kevan Bizilia4-6, 5-7
L#5 DoublesSteve Guenther / Eric Olsen vs Lamar Daniels / Scott Wilder0-6, 4-6
L#6 DoublesMichael Curvey / Josh Ehrhorn vs Deming Wang / Hongbiao Wang2-6, 1-6
2024-10-29vs Jim Lessley-YTC-Tuesday-FLEXWon 31
W#1 DoublesBret Peterson / Matt Schneller vs Janaki Alavalapati / James Lessley6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDan Hart / Grant Kirby vs Robert Scofield / Zach Walsh1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesGeorge Crandell / Mark Lovell vs Mark Murphy / Bob Reynods6-4, 6-3
W#5 DoublesWilliam Heaton / Wei Wang vs Lamar Daniels / Maddox Daniels6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Tuesday Night FLEX - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Neil Desai
published
3.20
Bret Peterson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.18
Matt Schneller
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #4 Doubles 20% · published
3.12
George Crandell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Lee Bryan
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published
2.91
Eric Olsen
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.88
Steve Guenther
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #6 Doubles 33% · published
2.78
Amrut Sadachar
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.78
Mark Lovell
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #5 Doubles 40% · published
Grant Kirby
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Josh Ehrhorn
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #6 Doubles 50% · published
Michael Curvey
usually #6 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
William Heaton
usually #5 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

George Crandell + Eric Olsen5074% gamesnot enough data
Matt Schneller + Bret Peterson2344% gamesnot enough data
Eric Olsen + Mark Lovell314 matchesnot enough data
Eric Olsen + Amrut Sadachar213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Neil Desai
71W–32L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.41
4
Bret Peterson
11W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
98%2%<1%
3.20
Matt Schneller
15W–16L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%10%90%
3.18
George Crandell
14W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%21%79%
3.12
Lee Bryan
8W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
2.94
Eric Olsen
22W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.91
Steve Guenther
8W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
2.88
Amrut Sadachar
9W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
Mark Lovell
10W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
Grant Kirby
8W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Josh Ehrhorn
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michael Curvey
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
William Heaton
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.