Teams

OC:Dolls with Balls:Durstin

2021 VT Tri-Level Women · 3.5 Women

3 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VERMONT

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-12-09vs TRS:CKS:ClappLost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Durstin / Noelle Vitt vs Pamela Clapp / Deborah Schoepke4-6, 5-7
2021-12-04vs ESB:RiehleLost 01
L#1 DoublesAmy Fleischer / Noelle Vitt vs Beverly Manitsky / Karen Plante2-6, 0-6
2021-11-14vs BOC:Spinsters:YandowLost 01
L#1 DoublesAmy Fleischer / Elizabeth Randall vs Lyn Sperry / Gwynn Yandow0-6, 2-6
2021-11-13vs ESB:RiehleLost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Durstin / Amy Fleischer vs Deidre Riehle / Beverly Manitsky0-6, 2-6
2021-10-24vs BOC:Spinsters:YandowLost 01
L#1 DoublesAmy Fleischer / Elizabeth Randall vs Lyn Sperry / Gwynn Yandow1-6, 0-6
2021-10-23vs ESB:BTC Gals:KirkpatrickLost 01
L#1 DoublesAmy Fleischer / Elizabeth Randall vs Stephanie Lacayo / Maureen Usifer0-6, 3-6
2021-10-02vs TRS:CKS:ClappLost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Durstin / Elizabeth Randall vs Pamela Clapp / Kristin Kassis2-6, 3-6
2021-09-22vs ESB:BTC Gals:KirkpatrickLost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Durstin / Noelle Vitt vs Shona Mossey-Lothrop / Maureen Usifer2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.95
Lisa Durstin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Amy Fleischer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Noelle Vitt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Fleischer + Lisa Durstin2937% games−11.5% vs expected
Noelle Vitt + Lisa Durstin224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisa Durstin
54W–58L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%66%34%
2.95
3
Amy Fleischer
8W–50L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Noelle Vitt
42W–44L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.