Teams

IA/Versteeg/18&Over3.5M

2024 IA 18 & Over Adult League · 3.5 Men

15 players · average NTRP 3.75 / IOWA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-04-27vs Johnston: GenesisWon 50
W#1 DoublesTony DAntuono / Patrick Mullen vs Jamie Johnson / Chris Shay3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesNeal Molitor vs Ryan Foo6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesColin Ashwood / Evan Gryska vs Adam Hulten / Alan Hoover6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesNick Stahly vs Nathan Johnston6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesThomas Hayes / John Karrmann vs Mark Richards / Mark Davidson6-3, 6-2
2024-04-13vs Johnson: AmesWon 40
W#1 DoublesJohn Micka / Neal Molitor vs Charles Hubbard / Blake McClure6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesNick Stahly vs Andy Almquist6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMax Wilker / Patrick Mullen vs Kurt Kinnevan / Michael Johnson6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesTodd Versteeg vs Michael Flanscha4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-03-30vs Rickert: LifetimeWon 21
W#1 DoublesTony DAntuono / Greyson Heiskell vs Tim Brunkhorst / Brian Rickert6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJohn Micka / Todd Versteeg vs Jeff Glasgow / Eric Pack6-1, 6-2
L#2 SinglesMichael Hutchison vs Ryan Rolwes4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-02-23vs Rickert: LifetimeWon 32
L#1 DoublesThomas Hayes / Todd Versteeg vs Brian Rickert / Justin Hattan0-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesJohn Micka vs Eric Pack6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMax Wilker / John Karrmann vs Tim Brunkhorst / Kent Christensen6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesMichael Hutchison vs Ryan Rolwes6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesColin Ashwood / Evan Gryska vs Mike Nixon / Luke Llewellyn6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2024-02-17vs Johnson: AmesSplit 22
L#1 DoublesRuben Avilez / Nick Stahly vs Daniel Burdick / Charles Hubbard5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesTony DAntuono / Greyson Heiskell vs Blake McClure / Michael Johnson6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesMichael Hutchison vs Andy Almquist4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJohn Karrmann / Max Wilker vs Jarod Carl / Kurt Kinnevan6-1, 6-4
2024-01-20vs Johnston: GenesisWon 30
W#1 DoublesRuben Avilez / Bryce Johnson vs Nathan Johnston / Lee Christie3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesGreyson Heiskell vs Scott Gabrilson6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesNeal Molitor / John Micka vs Adam Hulten / Jay Ewart6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 3.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1IA/Versteeg/18&Over3.5M6025518185
2Nesteby: NDAC5125517199
3Johnson: Ames33141632258
4Johnston: Genesis33121841290

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Bryce Johnson
published 4
Greyson Heiskell
usually #2 Doubles 25%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.72
Neal Molitor
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.53
John Micka
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.53
Max Wilker
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.48
Todd Versteeg
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.38
Michael Hutchison
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.34
John Karrmann
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.33
Ruben Avilez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Nick Stahly
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Evan Gryska
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.20
Colin Ashwood
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.99
Thomas Hayes
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Patrick Mullen
published
Tony DAntuono
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Colin Ashwood + Evan Gryska3455% games+8.3% vs expected
Max Wilker + John Micka9170% games+8.1% vs expected
Max Wilker + Michael Hutchison5257% games+2.2% vs expected
John Karrmann + Max Wilker12460% games−1.6% vs expected
Thomas Hayes + Michael Hutchison2355% games−3.6% vs expected
Tony DAntuono + Greyson Heiskell2344% gamesnot enough data
Ruben Avilez + John Karrmann404 matchesnot enough data
Ruben Avilez + Tony DAntuono224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bryce Johnson
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Greyson Heiskell
17W–11L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Neal Molitor
15W–9L career · 3 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.72
John Micka
61W–16L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%40%60%
3.53
Max Wilker
64W–32L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%41%59%
3.53
Todd Versteeg
40W–50L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%55%44%
3.48
Michael Hutchison
25W–28L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.38
John Karrmann
30W–14L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%89%10%
3.34
Ruben Avilez
33W–23L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.33
Nick Stahly
47W–43L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Evan Gryska
4W–10L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Colin Ashwood
10W–9L career · 2 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.20
Thomas Hayes
14W–22L career · 2 lines in 2024
54%46%<1%
2.99
Patrick Mullen
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tony DAntuono
22W–34L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.