Teams

Flodin

Coed Social League · 5.0 Seattle

6 players · average NTRP 2.60 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-08-18Lost 02
L#1 Female SinglesDana Day vs Yang Xu3-6
L#1 Male DoublesNeil Flodin / Wei Lin vs Abum Ezeonwu / Cal Muckelbauer5-6
2025-08-04vs Netflicks-HeoWon 21
L#1 Female DoublesDana Day / Naomi Mora vs Heeyeon Lee / Olga McGhee5-6
W#1 Female SinglesEmily Wiersema vs Heeyeon Lee6-1
W#1 Male SinglesNeil Flodin vs Zi Lin6-4
2025-07-28vs Racket Scientists-UngureanasuLost 03
L#1 Female DoublesEmily Wiersema / Naomi Mora vs Ioana Ungureanasu / Becca Mischke5-6
L#1 Female SinglesDana Day vs Roxana Rautu5-6
L#1 Male DoublesNeil Flodin / Wei Lin vs Mihai Petriuc / Tudor Fanaru4-6
2025-07-14vs Team Corgi-BrandtWon 21
W#1 Female DoublesEmily Wiersema / Dana Day vs Amelia Brandt / Rucha Rangnekar6-3
W#1 Female SinglesEmily Wiersema vs Andrea Tapia6-0
L#1 Male SinglesNeil Flodin vs Will Sather5-6
2025-07-07vs FernandezWon 20
W#1 Female SinglesEmily Wiersema vs Kailey Fernandez5-1
W#1 Male SinglesNeil Flodin vs Neil Hinnant6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · 5.0 Seattle
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Always Serving-Pena06279995
2Racket Scientists-Ungureanasu06241212131
3Netflicks-Heo06191717145
4Flodin06171919145
5Mo06171919140
6Team Corgi-Brandt06142222147
7Titcomb06132323160
8Fernandez0682828189
9Dryers-Sei0663030193

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.48 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.73
Neil Flodin
usually #1 Male Singles 60%, also #1 Male Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.67
Naomi Mora
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published 3
2.60
Wei Lin
published
2.40
Dana Day
usually #1 Female Doubles 50%, also #1 Female Singles 50% · published 2.5
2.37
Emily Wiersema
usually #1 Female Singles 75%, also #1 Female Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.11
Aidan Plunkitt
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Emily Wiersema + Dana Day303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Neil Flodin
27W–33L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%4%96%
2.73
3
Naomi Mora
52W–52L career · 8 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.67
Wei Lin
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
2.60
2.5
Dana Day
39W–34L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%78%22%
2.40
2.5
Emily Wiersema
18W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%85%15%
2.37
2.5
Aidan Plunkitt
7W–15L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.11

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.