Teams

Tri Harder

2025 Tri-Level League · Women 4.0, 3.5, 3.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-10-13vs TriadLost 12
L#1 DoublesKimberly Arch / Tina OBryan vs Isobel Suhr / Maria Chase7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesConnie Sprang / Lilya Matos vs Ellen Mitchell / Mary Cirilo6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesTatyana Garcia / Sharon Josephs vs Lisa Trapp / Lisa Crawford6-7, 3-6
2024-10-12vs ShavahoesLost 12
L#1 DoublesKimberly Arch / Kathleen Johnson vs Toni Hakim / Tami Wheeler2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesLaurin Shambora / Connie Sprang vs Viviane van Poppel / Maria Galarza-Garrett5-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesHope Baker / Tatyana Garcia vs Gina Rodriguez / Lily Schwegler6-0, 6-3
2024-10-12vs Shadow TriadLost 03
L#1 DoublesTina OBryan / Mollie Garcia vs Monica Salazar / Sharon Nichols3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLilya Matos / Marina Henkes vs Debbie Sumpter / Lisa Martinez5-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesTatyana Garcia / Sharon Josephs vs Nolette Brell / Lathia Bell6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2024-10-12vs Just TRI usLost 12
L#1 DoublesSara Ramirez / Mollie Garcia vs Wendi Kaplan / Elizabeth Vice6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesConnie Sprang / Lisa Chegin vs Yvonne Uhl / Kathy Burkholder5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesHope Baker / Shannon Wagner vs Carrie Ervin / Claudia Burkhardt6-4, 0-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Kimberly Arch
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.72
Mollie Garcia
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.69
Kathy Horton
published
3.68
Tina OBryan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.68
Sara Ramirez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.47
Laurin Shambora
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Lilya Matos
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Marina Henkes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Hope Baker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Sharon Josephs
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Connie Sprang
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Lisa Chegin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Tatyana Garcia
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Edith Morales
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mollie Garcia + Tina OBryan314 matchesnot enough data
Kimberly Arch + Tina OBryan224 matchesnot enough data
Sharon Josephs + Tatyana Garcia044 matchesnot enough data
Mollie Garcia + Sara Ramirez123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kimberly Arch
18W–23L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
3.87
Mollie Garcia
20W–22L career · 2 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.72
Kathy Horton
6W–11L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.69
Tina OBryan
26W–26L career · 2 lines in 2024
9%89%1%
3.68
Sara Ramirez
8W–9L career · 1 line in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
Laurin Shambora
34W–22L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%59%41%
3.47
Lilya Matos
20W–10L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
3.46
Marina Henkes
34W–41L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.40
Hope Baker
17W–22L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
Sharon Josephs
12W–22L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%89%9%
3.32
3.5
Connie Sprang
2W–4L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lisa Chegin
6W–12L career · 1 line in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Tatyana Garcia
5W–10L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
3.00
Edith Morales
6W–16L career · no lines in 2024
71%29%<1%
2.92

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.