Teams

Mid-Court Crisis

Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.67 / PHILADELPHIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-08-13vs West ChesterLost 02
L#1 DoublesLinda Rudnick / Ellen Carson vs Denise Rumsey / Nancy Duca6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMaria Zecca / Betty Angelucci vs Bonnie Shapiro / Erica Sorrentino-Sutton4-6, 0-6
2026-08-06vs JailbirdsWon 30
W#1 DoublesEllen Carson / Tami Sherman vs Deborah Malley / Karen Sokoloff6-3, 0-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKim Clearkin / Maria Zecca vs Judith Kemeny / Sarah Dinsel7-6, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLinda Rudnick / Kathryn Watson vs Susan Walter / Penny Link6-2, 6-2
2026-07-30vs Summer ShotsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesPatti Donato / Maria Zecca vs Stephanie Rossino / Anne Hesek2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesBarbara Dehaven / Ellen Carson vs Cindy Snyderman / Jenny Kaloudis5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2026-07-24vs Y NotsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesBarbara Dehaven / Linda Rudnick vs Elizabeth Rejonis / Sherry Frank7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMarrijo Gallagher / Betty Angelucci vs Leslie Swope / Linda Wattman4-6, 2-6
2026-07-23vs Wild HourLost 02
L#1 DoublesLinda Rudnick / Kathryn Watson vs Suzanne Levy / Mary Donoghue2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBarbara Dehaven / Maria Zecca vs Loranne Mazzulo / Pattie Heidengren3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2026-07-16vs No Strings AttachedLost 02
L#1 DoublesLinda Rudnick / Kathryn Watson vs Kristin Swanick / Natasha Smith1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBetty Angelucci / Tami Sherman vs Laurie Lynch / Daneen Downs1-6, 3-6
2026-07-15vs Whole Lotta LobLost 12
W#1 DoublesBarbara Dehaven / Linda Rudnick vs Karen Krane / Trish O'Brien6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMarrijo Gallagher / Ellen Carson vs Diane Hodgkiss / Kathy Wright1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesTami Sherman / Maria Zecca vs Shirley Graziani / Judy Christis2-6, 4-6
2026-06-25vs Love AllLost 03
L#1 DoublesEllen Carson / Betty Angelucci vs Patricia Sassoli / Emily Morgan0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTami Sherman / Maria Zecca vs Pierette Appasamy / Marjorie Volpp0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesBarbara Dehaven / Mary Louise Callahan vs Laurie Rodgers / Ellen Meriwether2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 7.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Spicey Old Ladies04111683
2Mid-Court Crisis043920124

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Kim Clearkin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.58
Patti Donato
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.38
Linda Rudnick
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.31
Barbara Dehaven
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.15
Ellen Carson
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.96
Betty Angelucci
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Kathryn Watson
published
Maria Zecca
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Marrijo Gallagher
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Mary Louise Callahan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sharon Wooters
published
Tami Sherman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maria Zecca + Tami Sherman3942% gamesnot enough data
Sharon Wooters + Barbara Dehaven1436% gamesnot enough data
Kim Clearkin + Sharon Wooters123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kim Clearkin
117W–98L career · 2 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.62
4
Patti Donato
150W–83L career · 1 line in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.58
3.5
Linda Rudnick
40W–43L career · type A · 6 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Barbara Dehaven
54W–118L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Ellen Carson
7W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Betty Angelucci
110W–261L career · 4 lines in 2026
61%39%<1%
2.96
Kathryn Watson
7W–9L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Maria Zecca
6W–19L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Marrijo Gallagher
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mary Louise Callahan
68W–52L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Sharon Wooters
55W–75L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Tami Sherman
4W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.