Teams

Court Jesters

2025 Adult 55 and Over League · 7.0 Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / OAHU

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2025-05-25vs Match Point 55+Won 20
W#2 DoublesThomas Deir / James Zagorski vs Stan Nakama / James Burkhart6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesMike Elhoff / Mark Landau vs Charles Leake / Jerry Wheeler6-3, 6-3
2025-05-18vs LatecomersWon 20
W#2 DoublesThomas Deir / James Zagorski vs Carl Yamaguchi / Richard Vermeesch6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesRichard Leclerc / Mike McPherson vs Gerald Noda / Glen Masaki6-4, 6-4
2025-05-11vs OC Older DolphinsSplit 11
W#2 DoublesMike Elhoff / Mark Landau vs Victor Poppinga / Vatche Martirosian7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesThomas Deir / David Pascua vs Julio Polo / Dick Rankin4-6, 3-6
2025-05-04vs Kakaako Bay RacKet ClubWon 10
W#3 DoublesRichard Leclerc / Mike McPherson vs Daryl Ching / Leighton Oshiro6-2, 6-1
2025-04-27vs Mas Swerty BarkadasLost 03
L#1 DoublesDavid Rosen / David Pascua vs Jesse Tano / Cecilio Aguirre2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMark Landau / Ian Greene vs Doug Michihara / Eugene Lee3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMike McPherson / James Zagorski vs Cy Yamamoto / Andrew Perez4-6, 5-7
2025-04-13vs Doug's DudesWon 10
W#3 DoublesRichard Leclerc / Jack Riley vs Douglas Choy / Milton Kwock3-6, 6-0, 1-0
2025-04-06vs Tennis The MenaceLost 02
L#2 DoublesRichard Manz / Mark Landau vs Wendell Kong / Erik Wong0-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMike McPherson / James Zagorski vs Darren Chang / Michael Ho1-6, 5-7
2025-03-30vs Makule Hawaii 55+ 7.0Won 21
L#1 DoublesErik Burian / Richard Leclerc vs Barry Nakasone / AL TAK0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesRichard Manz / Mark Landau vs Larry RANCHES / Wayne Tang6-2, 0-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJames Zagorski / Mike McPherson vs Petronilo Fuentes / Charles Kishimoto6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2025-03-23vs Penn Men 7.0 55+Won 10
W#1 DoublesDavid Pascua / Erik Burian vs Dean Yamamoto / Virgilio Julian2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-03-16vs Racquet MastersLost 02
L#1 DoublesMark Landau / Richard Manz vs Ryan Yamasaki / Dean Kozai6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRichard Leclerc / Ian Greene vs Dominic Dumlao / Scott Lawton2-6, 1-6
2025-03-09vs Bruceki’sWon 20
W#1 DoublesDavid Rosen / David Pascua vs Daniel Schmidt / Richard Brostrom4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMike Elhoff / Mark Landau vs Curtis Nakamura / Clayton Ing6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Mark Landau
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.37
Thomas Deir
published
3.36
Erland Odd
published 3.5
3.33
David Pascua
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
David Rosen
published 3.5
Erik Burian
published 3.5
James Zagorski
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.14
Mike Elhoff
published
3.12
Richard Manz
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.11
Ian Greene
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Jack Riley
published 3.5
3.09
Richard Leclerc
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Mike McPherson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Pascua + Mike Elhoff4261% games+16.8% vs expected
David Pascua + Thomas Deir3356% games+6.4% vs expected
Richard Manz + Mark Landau4651% games+2.3% vs expected
Erik Burian + Mike Elhoff3354% games+1.0% vs expected
David Pascua + Erik Burian1447% games−1.7% vs expected
Mark Landau + Ian Greene2345% games−4.5% vs expected
Richard Leclerc + Mark Landau2349% gamesnot enough data
Richard Manz + Ian Greene1442% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Mark Landau
89W–76L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
3.37
Thomas Deir
16W–26L career · no lines in 2025
<1%84%15%
3.37
3.5
Erland Odd
37W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.36
3.5
David Pascua
136W–136L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%89%10%
3.33
3.5
David Rosen
4W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Erik Burian
36W–35L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
James Zagorski
9W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mike Elhoff
31W–53L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%<1%
3.14
Richard Manz
49W–61L career · 3 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.12
3.5
Ian Greene
27W–47L career · 1 line in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.11
3.5
Jack Riley
12W–21L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.10
Richard Leclerc
63W–69L career · 5 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.09
Mike McPherson
13W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.