Teams

Real Housewives of Tennis

2022 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Weekday Women · NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.22 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-26vs Net AssetsWon 21
L#1 DoublesLisa Furgal / Jennifer Graham vs Amanda Kerr / Olga Minsky4-6, 5-4
W#1 SinglesLeanne Drake vs Nicole Lefton6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKaren Kaczmarek / Angela Tomaszewski vs Effie Hoffman / Kerry Purdy6-1, 6-2
2022-07-19vs Net AssetsLost 01
L#1 DoublesGenevieve Gilinger / Jacqueline Walker vs Karyn DeVito / Karen Pallotta3-6, 2-6
2022-07-12vs Net AssetsWon 20
W#2 DoublesKatie Plofchan / Stephanie Frauen vs Kerry Purdy / Effie Hoffman6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAnne McDonald / Joanna Schindler vs Sarah Matcher / Karen McNeice6-0, 6-0
2022-07-05vs Net AssetsWon 30
W#1 SinglesLeanne Drake vs Amanda Kerr2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJoanna Schindler / Angela Tomaszewski vs Effie Hoffman / Alison Lopez6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesStephanie Frauen / Anne McDonald vs Gina Dell'Atti / Nicole Lefton4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2022-06-28vs Net AssetsWon 10
W#3 DoublesKatie Plofchan / Lisa Furgal vs Karyn DeVito / Karen McNeice6-4, 6-1
2022-06-21vs Net AssetsWon 10
W#2 DoublesGenevieve Gilinger / Jacqueline Walker vs Karen Pallotta / Sarah Matcher6-2, 6-3
2022-06-17vs Net AssetsWon 10
W#2 DoublesPeggy OKeefe-Roediger / Joanna Schindler vs Hilary Dixon / Karyn DeVito2-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Elizabeth Young
published 3.5
3.40
Julie Kane
published
3.24
Lisa Furgal
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.11
Julie Collier
published
3.09
Angela Tomaszewski
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.05
Jennifer Graham
published
3.05
Stephanie Frauen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.00
Joanna Schindler
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.97
Donna James
published 3.5
2.97
Lauren Malone
published
2.90
Niki Friedman
published
2.87
Leanne Drake
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.83
Katie Plofchan
published
2.77
Kimberly Butler
published
2.75
Anne McDonald
published 3
2.64
Genevieve Gilinger
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Furgal + Angela Tomaszewski8851% games+9.2% vs expected
Stephanie Frauen + Angela Tomaszewski2744% gamesnot enough data
Leanne Drake + Angela Tomaszewski4354% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Furgal + Stephanie Frauen134 matchesnot enough data
Niki Friedman + Kimberly Butler213 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Furgal + Leanne Drake123 matchesnot enough data
Leanne Drake + Stephanie Frauen123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Elizabeth Young
36W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%23%77%
3.60
Julie Kane
14W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Lisa Furgal
204W–131L career · 2 lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.24
Julie Collier
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Angela Tomaszewski
111W–105L career · 2 lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.09
Jennifer Graham
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
3.05
3
Stephanie Frauen
117W–162L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%36%64%
3.05
3
Joanna Schindler
69W–70L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%51%49%
3.00
3.5
Donna James
4W–15L career · no lines in 2022
58%42%<1%
2.97
Lauren Malone
12W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%60%40%
2.97
Niki Friedman
7W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%21%
2.90
3
Leanne Drake
178W–263L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
2.87
Katie Plofchan
9W–2L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
2.83
Kimberly Butler
19W–10L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Anne McDonald
11W–13L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
2.75
3
Genevieve Gilinger
24W–29L career · 2 lines in 2022
14%85%<1%
2.64

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.