Teams

Da.Boone18C

2025 Capital Combo 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 2.57 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-09-12vs Ka.Manooch18CLost 12
W#1 DoublesAmanda Mullen / Jessica Vickers vs Anna Brown / Alicia Gilleskie7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJessy Ellis / Claire See vs Callie Hurst / Stephanie Styers2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesNina Thomas / Sarah Seward vs Dina Berling / Mallory Houchin2-6, 1-6
2025-08-28vs Ka.Manooch18CLost 12
L#1 DoublesJessy Ellis / Devany Ayers vs Arielle Dozier / Alicia Gilleskie6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesHelena Rumsey / Megan Wilkinson vs Anna Brown / Stephanie Styers1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJessica Vickers / Diane Pokorney vs Beth Johnson / Dina Berling6-4, 7-5
2025-08-22vs Me.McCaskill18CLost 03
L#1 DoublesAmanda Mullen / Jessica Vickers vs Lexie Batchelor / CarolAnn Wiggs5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDevany Ayers / Helena Rumsey vs Greyson McGrail / Katherine Teague3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesHaley Wetmore / Diane Pokorney vs Jenny Anderson / Lisa Hauser1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.11 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.79
Amanda Mullen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.36
Megan Wilkinson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.35
Diane Pokorney
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.27
Jessy Ellis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Helena Rumsey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.18
Jessica Vickers
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.04
Devany Ayers
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.02
Claire See
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.95
Danielle Boone
published 2.5
1.86
Haley Wetmore
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.81
Nina Thomas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
1.61
Joey Elphick
published
Sarah Seward
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Amanda Mullen
18W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%93%5%
2.79
Megan Wilkinson
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
0%85%15%
2.36
2.5
Diane Pokorney
2W–4L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
0%88%12%
2.35
Jessy Ellis
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%96%4%
2.27
2.5
Helena Rumsey
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jessica Vickers
8W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.18
2.5
Devany Ayers
1W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.04
2.5
Claire See
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.02
2.5
Danielle Boone
1W–6L career · type S · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.95
2.5
Haley Wetmore
1W–4L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.86
Nina Thomas
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.81
Joey Elphick
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.61
Sarah Seward
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.