Teams

Laramie

2024 WY Tri-Level · Cheyenne-Laramie Women 3.5 - 4.0 - 4.5

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / WYOMING

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-07-31vs Surfin’ the NetSplit 11
W#2 DoublesMegan Hayes / Nancy Peck vs Sheri Foster / Michelle Bush6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesGinger Paige / Shay Howlin vs Katherine Plowman / Brittany Wardle3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2024-07-24vs Surfin’ the NetLost 12
L#1 DoublesAnne Moore / Nancy Peck vs Janet McNutt / Ginger Phillips6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMegan Hayes / Ellen Laubhan vs Michelle Bush / Sheri Foster7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesPatricia Hansen / Ginger Paige vs Katherine Plowman / Brittany Wardle4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-07-19vs Surfin’ the NetWon 21
L#1 DoublesKaili Young / Anne Moore vs Janet McNutt / Ginger Phillips2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesCheryl Johnson / Ellen Laubhan vs Justine Barone / Michelle Bush6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPatricia Hansen / Shay Howlin vs Katherine Plowman / Priscilla Gill6-2, 6-3
2024-07-08vs Surfin’ the NetWon 30
W#1 DoublesAnne Moore / Kaili Young vs Janet McNutt / Ginger Phillips2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNancy Peck / Ellen Laubhan vs Justine Barone / Lorri Welsh6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesGinger Paige / Shay Howlin vs Priscilla Gill / Katherine Plowman6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Cheyenne-Laramie Women 3.5 - 4.0 - 4.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Laramie227513110
2Surfin’ the Net225716115

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.29
Kaili Young
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Anne Moore
published 4.5
3.59
Ellen Laubhan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.17
Ginger Paige
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Patricia Hansen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Megan Hayes
published
Nancy Peck
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Shay Howlin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patricia Hansen + Ginger Paige7942% games−9.8% vs expected
Nancy Peck + Ellen Laubhan10162% gamesnot enough data
Megan Hayes + Ellen Laubhan8156% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Kaili Young
68W–60L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
4.29
4.5
Anne Moore
14W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Ellen Laubhan
124W–91L career · 3 lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.59
3.5
Ginger Paige
26W–53L career · type A · 3 lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.17
3.5
Patricia Hansen
26W–60L career · 2 lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.16
Megan Hayes
15W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Nancy Peck
18W–7L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Shay Howlin
8W–4L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.