Teams

CT Brown - Wilkinson

2025 Duval Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed 18 & Over

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-08-19vs Sawgrass - WerbaWon 10
W#2 DoublesJill Gray / Mohamad Itani vs Jennifer Werba / John Werba6-3, 6-0
2025-08-15vs Julington Creek - CarrWon 10
W#1 DoublesJill Gray / Mohamad Itani vs Debra Sussman / Chris Carr7-6, 6-3
2025-08-01vs San Jose - CochranWon 10
W#2 DoublesJill Gray / Mohamad Itani vs Makenzi Conner / Michael Siebenhaar6-0, 6-0
2025-07-25vs Eagle Landing - BrinkWon 10
W#2 DoublesJill Gray / Eddie Kiep vs Kristi Emmet / Marshall Knight6-0, 6-0
2025-07-18vs Glen Kernan - KayeWon 21
W#1 DoublesElisabethe Lucien / George Bowles vs Amber Kenney / Craig Kaye6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKelly Kuchera / Paul Asuncion vs Stacy Gregory / Mike Gregory6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesHae Sin / Mohamad Itani vs Christi Bisson / Renard Rawls6-2, 6-3
2025-06-20vs Duval/Davidson/18&Over7.0MXDWon 10
W#2 DoublesJill Gray / Mohamad Itani vs Amanda Boyle / Frank de Angelis5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2025-05-23vs Baymeadows - TorresWon 10
W#1 DoublesJill Gray / Mohamad Itani vs Stephen Bennett / Svetlana Mityul6-7, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Mixed 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Mohamad Itani
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.51
Eddie Kiep
published
3.40
Luca Palombi
published
3.34
Jill Gray
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.33
Kelly Kuchera
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Paul Asuncion
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Kim Costello
published
2.80
Cindy Wilkinson
published 3
Elisabethe Lucien
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Ezekiel Haigler
published
George Bowles
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Hae Sin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ezekiel Haigler + Elisabethe Lucien3248% gamesnot enough data
Cindy Wilkinson + Mohamad Itani303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mohamad Itani
38W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.60
Eddie Kiep
20W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.51
Luca Palombi
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.40
Jill Gray
48W–60L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%87%13%
3.34
Kelly Kuchera
5W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
Paul Asuncion
8W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
Kim Costello
7W–14L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.14
3
Cindy Wilkinson
14W–14L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.80
Elisabethe Lucien
8W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Ezekiel Haigler
10W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
George Bowles
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Hae Sin
6W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.