Teams

McKinney/Jacobs-Chapman W4.0

2025 DALLAS TENNIS N · A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Friday

13 players · average NTRP 3.86 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-10-04vs Lakewood/Lamberson W4.0Lost 01
L#3 DoublesSally Purdy / Katheryn Ross vs Becky Clarke / Kate Walters6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2024-09-13vs Samuell Grand/Musick-Thornton W4.0Lost 02
L#1 SinglesCamille Cruz vs Bridget Goldman4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSally Purdy / Sarah Haskins vs Ann Thornton / Diane Hashimoto2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Friday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Holly Carraway
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.81
Katheryn Ross
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
3.80
Camille Cruz
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.78
Tanya Clay
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.77
Brooke Parks
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.71
Lia Allen
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 43% · published
3.71
Michelle McGuire
usually #1 Singles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
3.62
Angelique Chan Mcdaniel
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.39
Amanda Bodnar
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.31
Brandi Ciufi
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Emily Chapman
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
Sally Purdy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sarah Haskins
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tanya Clay + Lia Allen3251% games−4.3% vs expected
Katheryn Ross + Sarah Haskins6157% gamesnot enough data
Holly Carraway + Angelique Chan Mcdaniel5060% gamesnot enough data
Tanya Clay + Katheryn Ross123 matchesnot enough data
Sally Purdy + Sarah Haskins033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Holly Carraway
32W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.90
Katheryn Ross
38W–16L career · 10 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Camille Cruz
17W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
1%93%6%
3.80
Tanya Clay
19W–16L career · 7 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Brooke Parks
11W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
Lia Allen
23W–11L career · 7 lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.71
Michelle McGuire
17W–23L career · 7 lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Angelique Chan Mcdaniel
14W–18L career · 7 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.62
3.5
Amanda Bodnar
13W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
3.39
3.5
Brandi Ciufi
7W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
4
Emily Chapman
18W–20L career · 5 lines in 2025
93%7%<1%
3.30
Sally Purdy
1W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sarah Haskins
11W–12L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.