Teams

Scott/SVCC

2024 Adult Singles 18 & Over · 4.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 4.50 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-01-26vs Paschall/FACLost 02
L#1 SinglesAllison Earhart vs Diane Shaddoxx5-7, 4-6
L#2 SinglesElizabeth Arens vs Stephanie Murphy2-6, 2-6
2025-01-22vs Paschall/FACSplit 11
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Arens vs Diane Shaddoxx6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesCassie Dyer vs Rebecca White5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2025-01-03vs Paschall/FACWon 21
W#1 SinglesCasey Tevonian vs Rebecca White6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesLindsay Hall vs Stephanie Murphy3-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesAllison Earhart vs Mariko Paschall7-5, 6-4
2024-12-18vs Paschall/FACLost 02
L#2 SinglesLindsay Hall vs Diane Shaddoxx4-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesElizabeth Arens vs Rebecca White1-6, 4-6
2024-12-11vs Paschall/FACLost 02
L#1 SinglesAllison Earhart vs Diane Shaddoxx7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesElizabeth Arens vs Rebecca White3-6, 4-6
2024-12-05vs Paschall/FACLost 12
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Arens vs Diane Shaddoxx1-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesCasey Tevonian vs Mariko Paschall6-1, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesJackie Scott vs Allison Salmon6-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.99 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.07
Allison Earhart
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.06
Shailyn Abbott
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.99
Jackie Scott
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.98
Casey Tevonian
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 4.5
3.95
Cassie Dyer
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4.5
3.87
Elizabeth Arens
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
Lindsay Hall
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jackie Scott + Allison Earhart044 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Arens + Shailyn Abbott213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Allison Earhart
6W–13L career · 3 lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
4.07
Shailyn Abbott
18W–13L career · 1 line in 2024
33%67%<1%
4.06
Jackie Scott
5W–6L career · 1 line in 2024
52%48%<1%
3.99
4.5
Casey Tevonian
12W–7L career · 5 lines in 2024
57%43%<1%
3.98
4.5
Cassie Dyer
12W–5L career · 3 lines in 2024
64%36%<1%
3.95
Elizabeth Arens
3W–14L career · 5 lines in 2024
83%17%<1%
3.87
Lindsay Hall
7W–2L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.