Teams

Sa.Overholser40S

2023 Cap 40 & Over Singles League · 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.07 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-07-29vs Be.Fulcher40SLost 01
L#1 SinglesSarah Overholser vs Betsy Fulcher5-7, 6-7
2023-07-22vs Je.Komes40S3.0Won 10
W#2 SinglesAnn Garey vs Jenny Komes6-2, 6-3
2023-07-15vs Kr.Gilreath40SLost 01
L#1 SinglesAnn Garey vs Holly Atkinson2-6, 0-6
2023-07-08vs Je.Anderson40SLost 01
L#3 SinglesKathryn Shields vs Sara Mazurak0-6, 3-6
2023-07-01vs Ki.Lamb40SWon 20
W#1 SinglesSarah Overholser vs Dr Amy Linder7-5, 6-2
W#2 SinglesAnn Garey vs Jo Ann Novak6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2023-06-24vs Be.Fulcher40SLost 01
L#3 SinglesKathryn Shields vs Theresa Critcher3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-06-10Won 10
W#1 SinglesAnn Garey vs Michelle Mills6-3, 6-1
2023-06-03Won 10
W#1 SinglesSarah Overholser vs Jennifer Anderson6-3, 6-2
2023-05-30vs Ki.Lamb40SWon 30
W#1 SinglesSarah Overholser vs Vanessa Manuel6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 SinglesAnn Garey vs Jeannette Walker6-3, 7-5
W#3 SinglesKathryn Shields vs Brandi Washington6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
3.08
Sarah Overholser
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
2.84
Dana Aderhold
published 3
2.77
Ann Garey
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3
2.77
Charlotte Kopp
published 3
2.77
Kathryn Shields
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.66
Carter Grimes
published 3
2.65
Emily Boyer
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carter Grimes + Dana Aderhold123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Margaret Ann Gonella
20W–15L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.61
3.5
Sarah Overholser
123W–66L career · 4 lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.08
3
Dana Aderhold
7W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%11%
2.84
3
Ann Garey
94W–72L career · 5 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Charlotte Kopp
3W–13L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Kathryn Shields
88W–91L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Carter Grimes
5W–18L career · no lines in 2023
11%89%<1%
2.66
3
Emily Boyer
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
2.65

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.