Teams

Owens/PC/Foothills

2025 Foothills Tri-Level - 18 & over · Women's Group B 4.0-3.5-3.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-08-16vs Abernathy/HCP/FoothillsWon 10
W#3 DoublesChapel Davis / Chloee Dula vs Carissa Williams / Elena Willging7-6, 1-3
2025-07-15vs Abernathy/HCP/FoothillsWon 10
W#3 DoublesSusan Davis / Chapel Davis vs Carissa Williams / Julie Rodeck7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2025-07-08vs von Allmen/HCP/FoothillsLost 01
L#3 DoublesChapel Davis / Beth Martin vs Natalie von Allmen / Oksana Lackey6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2025-06-17vs Henderson/DV/FoothillsWon 10
W#3 DoublesChloee Dula / Chapel Davis vs Meghan Wills / Renner Murphy6-3, 6-1
2025-06-03vs Kim/RBCC/FoothillsLost 01
L#3 DoublesChapel Davis / Susan Davis vs Emily Spillman / Becky Brittain3-6, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's Group B 4.0-3.5-3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
3.66
3.42
Dawn Owens
published 4
3.14
Christina Long
published 3.5
3.10
Chloee Dula
usually #2 Doubles 55%, also #3 Doubles 46% · published 3
3.07
Catherine Lundberg
published 3.5
2.72
Chapel Davis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.41
Zenaida Camacho
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
Taylor Newton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chloee Dula + Chapel Davis314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ana Cristina Ivach
8W–3L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Charlotte Hartman
10W–13L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.66
4
Dawn Owens
3W–18L career · no lines in 2025
71%29%<1%
3.42
3.5
Christina Long
1W–12L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.14
3
Chloee Dula
80W–48L career · 11 lines in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.10
3.5
Catherine Lundberg
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.07
3
Chapel Davis
87W–97L career · 5 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
3
Zenaida Camacho
93W–164L career · 5 lines in 2025
73%27%<1%
2.41
Taylor Newton
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.