Teams

Lady Aces

2026 KS 18 & Over Adult Indoor League · 2.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 2.50 / KANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-15vs Elting-SalinaLost 03
L#1 DoublesHope Bright / Rosanne Greene vs Carrie Elting / Renelle Conner2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesLeila Loomis vs Abigail Lombardoni5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesTheresa Devlin / Marilyn Sanders vs Gabriel Levinson / Nicki Merkle3-6, 1-6
2026-03-15vs Elting-SalinaLost 03
L#1 DoublesHope Bright / Leila Loomis vs Abigail Lombardoni / Nicki Merkle4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMichaelAnn Cohlmia vs Renelle Conner3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJohana Teta / Rosanne Greene vs Carrie Elting / Gabriel Levinson1-6, 3-6
2026-02-26vs KS/Foster/18&Over2.5WLost 12
L#1 DoublesMichaelAnn Cohlmia / Johana Teta vs Lexie Farha / Ashley Brown3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesLeila Loomis vs Erica Ammar6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAlexandra Ahumada Palma / Carole Ryan vs Sara Ayesh / Chloe Spencer5-7, 1-6
2026-02-19vs KS/Foster/18&Over2.5WLost 12
L#1 DoublesKatherine Winner / Taryn Stoica vs Sara Ayesh / Ashley Brown2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesJenny Cole vs Patty Malone6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMichaelAnn Cohlmia / Theresa Devlin vs Lexie Farha / Danielle Cornejo2-6, 1-6
2026-02-15vs Elting-SalinaLost 12
L#1 DoublesMichaelAnn Cohlmia / Hope Bright vs Renelle Conner / Daschie Hrenchir6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W#1 SinglesLeila Loomis vs Gabriel Levinson6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKim Ritchie / Carole Ryan vs Nicki Merkle / Bridget Byquist6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2026-02-15vs Elting-SalinaLost 12
L#1 DoublesLeila Loomis / Marilyn Sanders vs Daschie Hrenchir / Bridget Byquist2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesHope Bright vs Renelle Conner6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRosanne Greene / Johana Teta vs Nicki Merkle / Gabriel Levinson6-7, 5-1, 1-0
2026-02-12vs KS/Foster/18&Over2.5WWon 21
W#1 DoublesAlexandra Ahumada Palma / Leila Loomis vs Erica Ammar / Haley Mason6-1, 6-3
L#1 SinglesTaryn Stoica vs Janine Kesterson-cravens0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesRosanne Greene / Kim Ritchie vs Anita Haycook / Ashley Brown6-2, 7-6
2026-02-02vs KS/Foster/18&Over2.5WLost 12
L#1 DoublesJenny Cole / Marilyn Sanders vs Erica Ammar / Lexie Farha3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesRosanne Greene vs Janine Kesterson-cravens6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKatherine Winner / Theresa Devlin vs Chloe Spencer / Sara Ayesh2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.17 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.64
Jenny Cole
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.53
Leila Loomis
usually #1 Singles 63%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
2.25
Kim Ritchie
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Alexandra Ahumada Palma
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Carole Ryan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.17
Johana Teta
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.11
Rosanne Greene
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
2.05
MichaelAnn Cohlmia
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.02
Hope Bright
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
1.89
Theresa Devlin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
1.85
Marilyn Sanders
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Katherine Winner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Taryn Stoica
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Taryn Stoica + Katherine Winner2536% games−3.6% vs expected
Rosanne Greene + Johana Teta224 matchesnot enough data
Rosanne Greene + Carole Ryan123 matchesnot enough data
Theresa Devlin + MichaelAnn Cohlmia213 matchesnot enough data
Theresa Devlin + Katherine Winner213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jenny Cole
18W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%16%84%
2.64
Leila Loomis
5W–22L career · 8 lines in 2026
0%41%59%
2.53
Kim Ritchie
19W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.25
2.5
Alexandra Ahumada Palma
1W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Carole Ryan
4W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Johana Teta
4W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.17
Rosanne Greene
21W–45L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.11
MichaelAnn Cohlmia
7W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.05
Hope Bright
6W–29L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.02
Theresa Devlin
10W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.89
Marilyn Sanders
0W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.85
Katherine Winner
6W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Taryn Stoica
3W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.