Teams

New Kids on the Block-Lorenzo

2024 Charlottesville Mixed 18 & Over · Charlottesville Mixed 18 & Over 7.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-28Won 10
W#1 DoublesMakenna Edgington / Paul Lorenzo vs Courtney Heyward / Joey Hanning2-6, 6-0, 1-0
2024-05-21vs ACAC-RauppWon 20
W#1 DoublesMakenna Edgington / Marcello de Montbel vs Matt Jones / Karin Jones6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSusan Cabell Mains / Alex de Montbel vs Maren Ward / Richard Sawyer6-1, 6-3
2024-05-19vs ACAC Breaking Bad-BaylissWon 20
W#1 DoublesChristina Lorenzo / Alex de Montbel vs Susan Bayliss / Angel Santiago Torres1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMarcello de Montbel / Makenna Edgington vs Gregory Parrish / Tory Stribling6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2024-05-12Won 10
W#1 DoublesChristina Lorenzo / Alex de Montbel vs Edward Lis / Pamela Jupin6-2, 6-1
2024-04-21Won 20
W#1 DoublesMarcello de Montbel / Makenna Edgington vs Derek Frazier / Melissa Zeller6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTyler Chow / Susan Cabell Mains vs Susan Bayliss / Bret Harris6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2024-03-25vs ACAC-RauppWon 10
W#2 DoublesAlex de Montbel / Susan Cabell Mains vs Tara Ford / Christopher Raupp7-6, 6-1
2024-03-17vs AHS Scared Hitless-LisSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAlex de Montbel / Megan Murr vs Pamela Jupin / Edward Lis6-0, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMakenna Edgington / Ray Zuniga vs Tim Hay / Stephanie Hall6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Charlottesville Mixed 18 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.99
Makenna Edgington
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.75
Alex de Montbel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 4
2.53
Susan Cabell Mains
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Marcello de Montbel
published
Megan Murr
published
Paul Lorenzo
published
Ray Zuniga
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Cabell Mains + Alex de Montbel6454% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Makenna Edgington
64W–22L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%54%46%
3.99
4
Alex de Montbel
95W–42L career · 10 lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.75
3
Christina Lorenzo
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Susan Cabell Mains
61W–85L career · type A · 3 lines in 2024
41%59%<1%
2.53
Marcello de Montbel
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Megan Murr
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Paul Lorenzo
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Ray Zuniga
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.