Teams

North Side Forehand Winner (NSFW)

Spring Adult 18 & Over WeekEND · Men's 4.5 18s

13 players · average NTRP 4.50 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-06-11vs Westover LamburgersLost 01
L#2 SinglesJustin Mart vs Michael Drew2-6, 1-6
2022-05-22vs Wilco Warriors 4.5Won 10
W#3 DoublesSteven Gilmer / Justin Mart vs John Ratcliff / Kalim Sawires6-1, 6-0
2022-05-08vs Southside Bangers 4.5Lost 01
L#3 DoublesEric Carstens / Justin Mart vs Andrew Sidel / Myles Gardner3-6, 5-7
2022-05-01vs Westwood 4.5Won 10
W#3 DoublesEric Carstens / Justin Mart vs Oscar Jackson / Guy MacNeill7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 4.5 18s have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.37 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.53
D'Artagnan Bebel
published 4.5
4.39
Kevin Serwatka
published
4.34
Justin Mart
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4.5
4.32
Evan Hays
published 4.5
4.26
Eric Carstens
published 4.5
Charles Herst
published 4.5
Corey Kruseman
published 4.5
David Bateman
published 4.5
Jeremy Jackson
published 4.5
Luis Abundis
published
Matthew Reininger
published
Steven Gilmer
published
Thomas Leyden
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Justin Mart + Eric Carstens404 matchesnot enough data
Evan Hays + Matthew Reininger303 matchesnot enough data
Justin Mart + Matthew Reininger303 matchesnot enough data
Matthew Reininger + Corey Kruseman213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
D'Artagnan Bebel
16W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%42%58%
4.53
Kevin Serwatka
18W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%80%19%
4.39
4.5
Justin Mart
21W–17L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
4.34
4.5
Evan Hays
34W–15L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
4.32
4.5
Eric Carstens
20W–6L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
4.26
4.5
Charles Herst
18W–11L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Corey Kruseman
6W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
David Bateman
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Jeremy Jackson
no matches on record · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Luis Abundis
15W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Matthew Reininger
19W–24L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Steven Gilmer
64W–21L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Thomas Leyden
28W–24L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.