Teams

SFV LLW - The 300's - Aldo Argana

2022 Adult 55 & Over - SFV · SFV 55 & Over - Men 8.0

17 players · average NTRP 4.08 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-08-20vs SFV Toluca Lake TolucansWon 10
W#1 DoublesDaniel Contreras / Shimon Nofar vs Cortes Alexander / Jeffery Shamberger6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2022-08-20vs SFV Toluca Lake TolucansWon 10
W#1 DoublesGus Batista / Shimon Nofar vs Jeff Gellman / Gonzalo Suarez3-6
2022-07-17vs SFV Paseo LegendsWon 10
W#3 DoublesShimon Nofar / Daniel Contreras vs Russell Baingo / Philip Smith6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 55 & Over - Men 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.87 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.33
Arthur Chen
published 4.5
4.24
Ivan Salazar
published 4.5
4.23
Daniel Nolan
published 4.5
4.16
Jaime Barajas
published 4.5
3.86
Shimon Nofar
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.85
Eric Schaefer
published 4
3.85
George Padgett
published 4
3.85
Edward Rozman
published 4
3.82
Adam Beilenson
published 4
3.77
Terry Hazell
published
3.73
Erik Houser
published 4
3.53
Richard Lorentz
published
Aldo Argana
published 3.5
3.16
Gus Batista
published 3.5
Frank Stefan
published
Peter Schuster
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

George Padgett + Terry Hazell7556% games−1.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Arthur Chen
19W–8L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
4.33
4.5
Ivan Salazar
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
4.24
4.5
Daniel Nolan
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
4.23
4.5
Jaime Barajas
5W–7L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
4.16
4
Shimon Nofar
217W–98L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%86%13%
3.86
4
Eric Schaefer
20W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.85
4
George Padgett
10W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.85
4
Edward Rozman
3W–1L career · type A · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.85
4
Adam Beilenson
8W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.82
Terry Hazell
10W–5L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Erik Houser
5W–1L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
Richard Lorentz
7W–12L career · no lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
3.53
3.5
Aldo Argana
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Gus Batista
2W–2L career · type A · no lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
3.16
Frank Stefan
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Peter Schuster
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Richard Petherbridge
6W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.