Teams

Kuebert/Piedmont 18 3.0W Singles Sunday

2025 Piedmont Singles 18 · 3.0 Women Singles Sun

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 SinglesCozetta Gaines vs Gayle Taylordean7-6, 6-1
W#2 SinglesSuki Gutierrez vs Sammie Jo McCluskey6-3, 6-4
L#3 SinglesWhitney Kuebert vs Gracie Thompson2-6, 4-6
2025-07-27vs Olalere 18+ 3.0W Singles SundayWon 21
W#1 SinglesCozetta Gaines vs Misty Hilliard4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesClara Gonzalez Flores vs Meghan Flynn6-0, 2-0
L#3 SinglesGraceanne Schuster vs Shelly Tuhro0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesSuki Gutierrez vs Rachel Bryant3-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesKylie Roy vs Nancy Stoddard6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesWhitney Kuebert vs Meredith Vaughn6-4, 6-3
2025-07-13vs Keaney 18 3.0W Singles SundayLost 03
L#1 SinglesCozetta Gaines vs Cackie Marsh2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesKylie Roy vs Alexa Smith3-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesGraceanne Schuster vs Catherine Martin1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesGraceanne Schuster vs Catherine Johnstone1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesKylie Roy vs Sammie Jo McCluskey6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 SinglesWhitney Kuebert vs Noreena Cole7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2025-06-22vs Olalere 18+ 3.0W Singles SundayLost 12
L#1 SinglesSuki Gutierrez vs Meghan Flynn4-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesKylie Roy vs Whitney Gansman5-7, 4-6
W#3 SinglesClara Gonzalez Flores vs Andrea Spencer6-0, 6-3
L#1 SinglesCozetta Gaines vs Nancy Stoddard3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 SinglesClara Gonzalez Flores vs Ji Kim6-2, 6-1
W#3 SinglesWhitney Kuebert vs Meredith Vaughn6-2, 6-1
2025-06-08vs Keaney 18 3.0W Singles SundayWon 21
L#1 SinglesGraceanne Schuster vs Rachel Mohorn1-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesSuki Gutierrez vs Jill Phelps6-4, 6-1
W#3 SinglesKylie Roy vs Catherine Martin6-0, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women Singles Sun have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.97
Clara Gonzalez Flores
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 3
2.87
Suki Gutierrez
usually #2 Singles 46%, also #1 Singles 36% · published
2.81
Cozetta Gaines
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.70
Kylie Roy
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #3 Singles 20% · published
2.51
Whitney Kuebert
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.42
Graceanne Schuster
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Clara Gonzalez Flores
43W–27L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
2.97
Suki Gutierrez
32W–43L career · 11 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
2.87
3
Cozetta Gaines
17W–22L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
2.81
Kylie Roy
4W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
2.70
Whitney Kuebert
6W–22L career · 4 lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
2.51
3
Graceanne Schuster
5W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
74%26%<1%
2.42

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.