Teams

Queens of the Court

Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / PHILADELPHIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-05vs Northampton Hot ShotsWon 21
W#1 DoublesPenni Sander / Linda Margaritonda vs Patricia Binder / Nancy Mcdade6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJune Millington / Jean Boyd vs Lori Nessel / Tracy Russo6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesTanya Evanchik Kinney / Diane Otto vs Rong Nie / Regina Walker6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2026-07-29vs DTC 55 SummerWon 21
W#1 DoublesPenni Sander / Linda Margaritonda vs Anne GRANT / Patricia Jordan6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesKathleen Jones / Ann de Waele vs Hilary Stephens / Suzanne Baldwin3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCarole-Ann Inserra / Heidi Dous vs Lucy Montgomery / Lynda Heflich6-7, 4-2, 1-0
2026-07-15vs Northampton Hot ShotsWon 30
W#1 DoublesJune Millington / Kathleen Jones vs Lori Nessel / Tracy Russo6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTanya Evanchik Kinney / Diane Otto vs Elizabeth Ast / Diana Dwight7-5, 7-6
W#3 DoublesJean Boyd / Jeannine Wachinski vs Leslie Hawkes / Victoria Shaup6-3, 6-0
2026-07-08vs DTC 55 SummerWon 21
W#1 DoublesJune Millington / Kris Young vs Anne GRANT / Carrie Tofig4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKathleen Jones / Jeannine Wachinski vs Patricia Jordan / Emily Barere6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCarole-Ann Inserra / Heidi Dous vs Lynda Heflich / Suzanne Baldwin6-3, 6-1
2026-06-24vs Northampton Hot ShotsWon 21
W#1 DoublesJune Millington / Ann de Waele vs Patricia Binder / Tracy Russo6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPenni Sander / Kathleen Jones vs Rong Nie / Regina Walker6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDiane Otto / Patricia Reilly vs Annie Pollina / MARI KAMIYAMA4-6, 1-6
2026-06-17vs DTC 55 SummerLost 12
L#1 DoublesPenni Sander / Kathleen Jones vs Anne GRANT / Carrie Tofig2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKris Young / Ann de Waele vs Suzanne Baldwin / Lucy Montgomery6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesGwen Wills / Cynthia Borda vs Stephanie Stroman / Margery Hoffman3-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Carole-Ann Inserra
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.47
Penni Sander
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.47
Kris Young
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.44
Ann de Waele
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.37
Linda Margaritonda
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.28
Jean Boyd
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.28
June Millington
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.20
Jeannine Wachinski
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.13
Tanya Evanchik Kinney
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.12
Gwen Wills
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Diane Otto
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.88
Heidi Dous
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.71
Cynthia Borda
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Kathleen Jones
published
Patricia Reilly
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeannine Wachinski + Kris Young4255% games+10.3% vs expected
Cynthia Borda + Gwen Wills7512845% games−1.5% vs expected
Cynthia Borda + Heidi Dous1935% games−7.5% vs expected
Heidi Dous + Patricia Reilly044 matchesnot enough data
Tanya Evanchik Kinney + Kris Young224 matchesnot enough data
Linda Margaritonda + Penni Sander303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cathy McBarnette-Neilley
0W–6L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Carole-Ann Inserra
202W–85L career · 2 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.55
3.5
Penni Sander
76W–77L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
3.47
Kris Young
98W–49L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Ann de Waele
109W–102L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.44
3.5
Linda Margaritonda
60W–108L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%84%16%
3.37
Jean Boyd
107W–104L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
June Millington
37W–42L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Jeannine Wachinski
95W–117L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Tanya Evanchik Kinney
100W–85L career · 2 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Gwen Wills
96W–150L career · 1 line in 2026
17%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Diane Otto
76W–72L career · 3 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.11
3
Heidi Dous
179W–157L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
Cynthia Borda
89W–163L career · 1 line in 2026
6%93%1%
2.71
Kathleen Jones
2W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Patricia Reilly
9W–26L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.