Teams

Courtside Queens

2025 40 & OVER WEEKDAY WOMEN · 3.5 W Thursday

13 players · average NTRP 3.38 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-03-07vs FOR FireballsLost 23
W#1 DoublesKatie Morgan / Patricia Clark vs Kerry Napper / Jacqueline Gross6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesCori Brantner vs Victoria Lutterloh6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLindsey Perez / Natasha Patrick vs Kathy Burkholder / Natalie Drayton4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDiane Garner / Holly DeLaune vs Sheila Gentry / Susan Daum3-6, 2-6
L#4 DoublesNorma Randleston / Sally Zambrano vs Yvonne Uhl / Sharon Winter3-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 W Thursday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Cori Brantner
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.39
Patricia Clark
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Lindsey Perez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Natasha Patrick
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Beth Morse
published 3.5
3.18
Norma Randleston
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Talat Shah
published
3.17
Sally Zambrano
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Susan Dorwaldt
published
3.09
Diane Garner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.96
Holly DeLaune
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.95
Alessandra Allen
published 3
Lou Ann Hippensteel
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Norma Randleston + Lindsey Perez4251% games+6.2% vs expected
Beth Morse + Natasha Patrick3343% games+0.9% vs expected
Norma Randleston + Patricia Clark134 matchesnot enough data
Patricia Clark + Lindsey Perez213 matchesnot enough data
Holly DeLaune + Diane Garner033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cori Brantner
14W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.42
Patricia Clark
6W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%78%21%
3.39
Lindsey Perez
7W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.36
Natasha Patrick
7W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Beth Morse
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.20
Norma Randleston
12W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Talat Shah
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.17
Sally Zambrano
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
12%87%1%
3.17
Susan Dorwaldt
3W–9L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
3.5
Diane Garner
5W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
26%73%<1%
3.09
Holly DeLaune
11W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%61%39%
2.96
3
Alessandra Allen
2W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.95
Lou Ann Hippensteel
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.