Teams

WI 3.0 Metro W Messling

2026 WI Adult 18 & Over Metro Fall Leagues · MKE Metro 3.0 Women's (non-advancing)

4 players · average NTRP 3.00 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →

Flight standings for MKE Metro 3.0 Women's (non-advancing) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.89
MICHELLE MESSLING
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
2.59
Sue Mather
published
2.58
Renee LeSage
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

MICHELLE MESSLING + Amy Germershausen9364% games+8.9% vs expected
MICHELLE MESSLING + Renee LeSage61246% games+1.1% vs expected
Amy Germershausen + Renee LeSage3252% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
MICHELLE MESSLING
57W–53L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.89
3
Amy Germershausen
46W–54L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.74
Sue Mather
3W–10L career · no lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
2.59
Renee LeSage
23W–31L career · no lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
2.58

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.