Teams

GOLD RIVER RC 18AW4.0A

2024 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 4.0

17 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
So Jung Yoon
published
3.90
Lizban Habte
published
3.87
Amy Putty
published 4
3.85
Karen Edling
published
3.83
Meuy Saechao
published
3.78
Amy Dai
published 4
3.76
Irene Stafford
published
3.74
Erika Stone
published
3.66
Denise Kimes
published 4
3.59
Tracy Gillis
published
3.56
Heather Burnham
published
3.56
Carmen Micsa
published 4
3.55
Laurie Selover
published
3.53
Victoria Eidemiller
published
3.44
Soo Pae
published
Francesca Hernaez
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Putty + Irene Stafford5056% games+7.7% vs expected
Amy Putty + Laurie Selover3550% games−1.6% vs expected
Heather Burnham + Laurie Selover0636% games−2.2% vs expected
Irene Stafford + Victoria Eidemiller4250% games−3.1% vs expected
Heather Burnham + Denise Kimes314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

So Jung Yoon
7W–16L career · no lines in 2024
47%53%<1%
4.01
Lizban Habte
1W–11L career · no lines in 2024
76%24%<1%
3.90
4
Amy Putty
25W–18L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.87
Karen Edling
14W–16L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%14%
3.85
Meuy Saechao
14W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.83
4
Amy Dai
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
Irene Stafford
14W–9L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.76
4
Angelina Eidemeiller
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Erika Stone
28W–23L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.74
4
Denise Kimes
15W–18L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.66
Tracy Gillis
3W–9L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.59
Heather Burnham
11W–20L career · no lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
3.56
4
Carmen Micsa
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
3.56
Laurie Selover
8W–29L career · no lines in 2024
35%65%<1%
3.55
Victoria Eidemiller
8W–9L career · no lines in 2024
41%59%<1%
3.53
Soo Pae
23W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%66%34%
3.44
Francesca Hernaez
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.