Teams

YTC - Alley Cats

2025 Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 WOMEN

8 players · average NTRP 2.80 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-02-22vs CBRC - PorterWon 21
W#1 DoublesAmy Helms / Claire Bardwell vs Shirley Qiao / Xingyuan Chen4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSarah Gueck vs Karina Klein2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKellye Richelderfer / Pamela Urquhart vs Kim Pak / Andrea Porter6-2, 6-1
2025-02-22vs PFC - JJ BallsLost 03
L#1 DoublesMandy Manning / Kellye Richelderfer vs Lilia Kondo / Anne Schnurman4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJacqueline Degrasse vs Dee Beck Information Architect6-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesSasha Grigoryants / Sarah Gueck vs Piper Peterson / Kate Blevins2-6, 1-6
2025-02-21vs EW-PC-KhounnalaWon 30
W#1 DoublesAmy Helms / Mandy Manning vs Lexi Adams / Maggie Levy6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesPamela Urquhart vs Sunghee Moon6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJacqueline Degrasse / Claire Bardwell vs Hannah Fiocchi / Britney Donais6-4, 0-6, 1-0
2025-02-21vs HRAC - PiratesWon 30
W#1 DoublesJacqueline Degrasse / Kellye Richelderfer vs Sara Taggart / Leslie Stanfield1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMandy Manning vs Noel Larsen6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesPamela Urquhart / Sasha Grigoryants vs Lisa Vinciguerra / Amy Klee7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 2.5 WOMEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1EW-PC-Khounnala3193890
2YTC - Alley Cats318411106
3PFC - JJ Balls227513103
4CBRC - Porter134818124
5HRAC - Pirates1321020120

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.46 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.73
Pamela Urquhart
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.63
Mandy Manning
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.57
Jacqueline Degrasse
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.49
Amy Helms
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Claire Bardwell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.24
Kellye Richelderfer
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.10
Sasha Grigoryants
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sarah Gueck
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Pamela Urquhart
16W–19L career · 5 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Mandy Manning
13W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%18%82%
2.63
3
Jacqueline Degrasse
10W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
2.57
3
Amy Helms
4W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.49
2.5
Claire Bardwell
2W–0L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Kellye Richelderfer
9W–19L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.24
Sasha Grigoryants
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.10
Sarah Gueck
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.