Teams

AC Winter Flex 2025

2025 Winter Flex Singles · 3.5 Women

1 player · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-05-23vs Defying gravityLost 01
L#1 SinglesAlicia Cullison vs Shweta Agrawal3-6, 4-6
2025-05-12vs K. KatayamaWon 10
W#1 SinglesAlicia Cullison vs Kourtnie Katayama6-0, 6-4
2025-04-18vs KaradiseLost 01
L#1 SinglesAlicia Cullison vs Kara Place5-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Karadise6161351
2NGA3030117
3Defying gravity3131232
4AC Winter Flex 20251212429
5Joy Lin1212429
6Melissa Smith000000
7Nolan0101211
8Love Hurts More0202419
9K. Katayama06061168

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Alicia Cullison
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Alicia Cullison
9W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.