Teams

AHunt (Matthews)

2025 Combo Doubles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over 7.5 Men - Mon PM

12 players · average NTRP 3.40 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-08vs PKartes/RBombien (Mountainbrook)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKrishna Swain / Wesley Wright vs Patrick Kartes / Thomas Dukes1-6, 1-6
2025-10-06vs TFarley (Park Crossing)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJeff Morgan / Krishna Swain vs Ian Dabrowski / Rick Haskell4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-09-22vs DWatson (Queens)Won 10
W#1 DoublesJeff Morgan / Krishna Swain vs Jason Olszewski / Joseph Moubarak6-4, 6-4
2025-09-08vs JRitter (Weddington)Won 10
W#3 DoublesKrishna Swain / Bryant Barnhardt vs Martin Iles / DJ Kulkarni6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2025-09-01vs JWolf (WSRC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesHien Jimmy Nguyen / Krishna Swain vs Jeremy Caslin / Billy Stover6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2025-08-18vs TFarley (Park Crossing)Won 10
W#3 DoublesAndy Hunt / Krishna Swain vs Juan Sintes / Lin Hollowell6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over 7.5 Men - Mon PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Jeff Morgan
published
3.54
Todd Kasler
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.48
David Whiteman
published 3.5
3.38
Edward Scholl
published
3.34
Krishna Swain
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.25
Tom Gill
published
2.92
Andy Hunt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.89
Bryant Barnhardt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Hien Jimmy Nguyen
published
Larry Pratt
published
Randy Loman
published
Wesley Wright
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Krishna Swain + David Whiteman2446% games−0.1% vs expected
Krishna Swain + Jeff Morgan134 matchesnot enough data
Andy Hunt + David Whiteman314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeff Morgan
4W–7L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.60
3.5
Todd Kasler
58W–36L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.54
3.5
David Whiteman
15W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.48
Edward Scholl
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
81%19%<1%
3.38
3.5
Krishna Swain
74W–93L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
Tom Gill
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
3
Andy Hunt
4W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%73%27%
2.92
3.5
Bryant Barnhardt
0W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
79%21%<1%
2.89
Hien Jimmy Nguyen
14W–10L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Larry Pratt
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Randy Loman
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Wesley Wright
1W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.